Skip to content

CARBOMEDICS SUPRA-ANNULAR (TOP HAT) S5-019Recalls & reported problems

Corcym Srl · Class 3 · Implant

All models of CARBOMEDICS SUPRA-ANNULAR (TOP HAT) (5)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
4
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08022057012890), received between Jun 8, 2017 and Apr 5, 2024 — classified as 4 deaths, 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 2 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information7
  • Difficult to Open or Close2
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size2
  • Incomplete Coaptation1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information6
  • Death2
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 5, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    BASED ON THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM PATIENT TRACKING DEPARTMENT, A CARBOMEDICS TOP HAT MECHANICAL HEART VALVE S5-019 THAT WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2019, WAS EVENTUALLY EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19055697 ↗
  • InjuryApr 5, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    BASED ON THE INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM PATIENT TRACKING DEPARTMENT, A CARBOMEDICS TOP HAT MECHANICAL HEART VALVE S5-019 THAT WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2019, WAS EVENTUALLY EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19055687 ↗
  • InjuryMar 15, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE MANUFACTURER WAS INFORMED OF THIS EVENT THROUGH PATIENT TRACKING. THE TOP HAT SUPRANUCLEAR VALVE SIZE 19, WHICH WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2013, WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2020 DUE TO SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS AND VALVULAR DISEASE. THE ST. JUDE 21MM VALVE WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT INSTEAD. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS PRESENTLY AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 13772158 ↗
  • DeathDec 2, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE MANUFACTURER WAS INFORMED OF THIS EVENT THROUGH THE DEVICE TRACKING DEPARTMENT. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REPORTED IN THE PATIENT IMPLANT FORM, A CARBOMEDICS TOP HAT VALVE S5-019 WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2021. THE FORM ALSO INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT PASSED AWAY ON THE SAME DAY. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT RECEIVED MULTIPLE VALVE REPLACEMENTS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS PRESENTLY AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12917745 ↗
  • DeathDec 2, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE MANUFACTURER WAS INFORMED OF THIS EVENT THROUGH THE DEVICE TRACKING DEPARTMENT. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REPORTED IN THE PATIENT IMPLANT FORM, A CARBOMEDICS TOP HAT VALVE S5-019 WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2021. THE FORM ALSO INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT PASSED AWAY ON THE SAME DAY. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT RECEIVED MULTIPLE VALVE REPLACEMENTS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS PRESENTLY AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12917733 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2021Difficult to Open or Close; Difficult to Open or Close

    ON (B)(6) 2021, A CARBOMEDICS TOP HAT VALVE MODEL S5-019 WAS INTENDED FOR AN AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (NATIVE VALVE) PROCEDURE. AS CONFIRMED, THE DEVICE WAS TESTED WITH THE DEDICATED TESTER AND NO FAULT WAS IDENTIFIED AT THAT TIME. DURING UNCLAMPING, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT THE VALVE WAS STUCK WHEN OPENING, SPECIFICALLY, ONE LEAFLET DID NOT OPEN AND DID NOT ALLOW FLOW. AS SUCH, THE SURGEON REMOVED THE DEVICE AND TRIED TO REPOSITION IT IN THE PATIENT, FIRST TESTING THE VALVE WITH THE DEDICATED TESTERS. THEN, THE VALVE WAS REMOVED, AND A NEW CARBOMEDICS STANDARD AORTIC VALVE WAS PUT IN, WHICH WORKED AT THE TIME OF PLACEMENT. AS REPORTED, THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE TOP HAT VALVE MODEL S5-019 VALVE WAS APPROVED, THE FAILURE WAS DETECTED WHEN UNPINNING AND AT THIS TIME IT WAS REALIZED THAT THE VALVE LEAFLETS DID NOT OPEN. THERE WAS NO BAD POSITION, IT WAS MEASURED, TESTED AND BROKEN WITH THE DEVICE'S GAUGES AND ROTATORS CORRECTLY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12025763 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2021Difficult to Open or Close; Difficult to Open or Close

    ON (B)(6) 2021, A CARBOMEDICS TOP HAT VALVE MODEL S5-019 WAS INTENDED FOR AN AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (NATIVE VALVE) PROCEDURE. AS CONFIRMED, THE DEVICE WAS TESTED WITH THE DEDICATED TESTER AND NO FAULT WAS IDENTIFIED AT THAT TIME. DURING UNCLAMPING, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT THE VALVE WAS STUCK WHEN OPENING, SPECIFICALLY, ONE LEAFLET DID NOT OPEN AND DID NOT ALLOW FLOW. AS SUCH, THE SURGEON REMOVED THE DEVICE AND TRIED TO REPOSITION IT IN THE PATIENT, FIRST TESTING THE VALVE WITH THE DEDICATED TESTERS. THEN, THE VALVE WAS REMOVED, AND A NEW CARBOMEDICS STANDARD AORTIC VALVE #18 WAS PUT IN, WHICH WORKED AT THE TIME OF PLACEMENT. AS REPORTED, THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE TOP HAT VALVE MODEL S5-019 VALVE WAS APPROVED, THE FAILURE WAS DETECTED DURING THE WEANING FROM BYPASS AND AT THIS TIME IT WAS REALIZED THAT THE VALVE LEAFLETS DID NOT OPEN. THE VALVE WAS ALREADY SUTURED, AND AT THE TIME OF WEANING FROM BYPASS THERE WAS NO MOVEMENT OF THE LEAFLETS, SO THE PATIENT WAS UNABLE TO EXIT THE EXTRACORPOREAL PUMP. THERE WAS NO BAD POSITION, IT WAS MEASURED, TESTED AND BROKEN WITH THE DEVICE'S GAUGES AND ROTATORS CORRECTLY. THE VALVE WAS REPORTEDLY NOT BROKE OR BROKEN IN THE PROCESS.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12021407 ↗
  • DeathJul 15, 2019Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    ON (B)(6) 2019, A TOP HAT SIZE 19 WAS REPORTEDLY IMPLANTED/EXPLANTED ON THE SAME DAY. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REPORTED, THE PATIENT PASSED AWAY ON THE SAME DAY. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Death

    MAUDE report 8791469 ↗
  • DeathJul 15, 2019Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    ON (B)(6) 2019, A TOP HAT SIZE 19 WAS REPORTEDLY IMPLANTED/EXPLANTED ON THE SAME DAY. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REPORTED, THE PATIENT PASSED AWAY ON THE SAME DAY. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Death

    MAUDE report 8791404 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2017Incomplete Coaptation; Incomplete Coaptation

    ON (B)(6) 2017 A CARBOMEDICS TOP HAT MECHANICAL HEART VALVE WAS IMPLANTED. ON (B)(6) 2017 THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED AS THE VALVE HAD ONE OF THE LEAFLETS JAMMED. THE SECOND LEAFLET WAS FUNCTIONING BUT WAS DAMAGED DURING EXPLANTATION. A PERCEVAL VALVE WAS CHOSEN BY THE SURGEON TO AVOID HAVING TO RE-SUTURE ON THE SAME AREA AND SINCE EXPLANATION WAS NOT STRAIGHT FORWARD HE OPTED FOR A FASTER SOLUTION LIKE PERCEVAL. THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6625184 ↗

Other HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL devices

All HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page