CARBOMEDICS CARBO-SEAL AP-027Recalls & reported problems
Corcym Srl · Class 3 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08022057013491), received between Jun 28, 2026 and Jun 28, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 28, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF AN INTRAOPERATIVE EXPLANT INVOLVING CARBOSEAL ASCENDING AORTIC PROSTHESIS THROUGH DEVICE TRACKING. BASED ON THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE, A CARBOSEAL ASCENDING AORTIC PROSTHESIS AP-027 WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE IMPLANTED AS FOLLOWS: THE SURGEON WAS DOING A BENTALL PROCEDURE (VALVE/AORTIC ROOT REPLACEMENT). SIZED FOR A CARBOSEAL 27 (AP-027). PUT THE SUTURES IN THE ANNULUS IN THE NORMAL FASHION, FOLLOWED BY PUTTING THEM THROUGH THE SEWING CUFF OF THE VALVE. LOWERED IT DOWN INTO PLACE AND STARTED TYING IT IN ON ONE SIDE. WHEN THE SURGEON BEGAN TYING THE VALVE IN ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE, A POP WAS FELT. THROUGH INSPECTION, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE LVOT ON THE LEFT SIZE HAD BEEN TORN AND THERE WAS THEN A HOLE. AS SUCH, THEY HAD TO REMOVE THE CARBOSEAL, REPAIR THE TISSUE AND AT THAT TIME DECIDED TO IMPLANT A GRAFT (TERUMO GELWEAVE), FOLLOWED BY A TOP HAT AORTIC VALVE S5-025 INSIDE THE GRAFT TO KEEP IT SUPRA-ANNULAR AND AWAY FROM THE REPAIR ON THE HEART AS WELL AS THE GRAFT ANASTOMOSIS. THE PATIENT RECOVERED FINE AND HAS SINCE BEEN DISCHARGED HOME. BASED ON THE MEDICAL JUDGMENT RECEIVED, THE PATIENT HAD VERY POOR-QUALITY TISSUES WHICH WERE RELATED TO THE TEAR.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25647273 ↗
Other HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL devices
- On-X Mitral Heart Valve with Conform-X Sewing Ring ONXMC-25/33On-X Life Technologies, Inc. · Heart-Valve, Mechanical1 recall1 death34 reports
- SJM Regent™ AGFN-756St. Jude Medical, Inc. · HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL3 deaths70 reports
- SJM Regent™ AGFN-756St. Jude Medical, Inc. · HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL5 deaths66 reports
- SJM Regent™ 23AGFN-756St. Jude Medical, Inc. · HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL3 deaths44 reports
- CARBOMEDICS SUPRA-ANNULAR (TOP HAT) S5-021Corcym Srl · HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL7 deaths37 reports
- Regent™ 21AGFN-756St. Jude Medical, Inc. · HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL3 deaths35 reports
- Regent™ 23AGFN-756St. Jude Medical, Inc. · HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL2 deaths33 reports
- Regent™ 19AGFN-756St. Jude Medical, Inc. · HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL31 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page