Skip to content

Delta Dual Mobility System 5885.09.040Recalls & reported problems

Limacorporate SPA · Liner #M for Mobile Liner Dia. 40 mm · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08033390086332), received between Feb 20, 2026 and Mar 6, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Implant Pain1
  • Medical device site infection1
  • Metal Related Pathology1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 6, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A HIP REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026 DUE TO DELAYED WOUND HEALING AND SUSPECTED INFECTION. THE SURGEON FOLLOWED THE STANDARD SURGICAL WORKFLOW TO GAIN ACCESS TO THE SITE, STARTING WITH DEBRIDEMENT OF THE TISSUE AROUND THE WOUND AND COLLECTING FLUID AND TISSUE SAMPLES ALONG THE WAY. THE DUAL-MOBILITY POLYETHYLENE HEAD, LINER AND DELTA TT CUP WERE ALL REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW IMPLANTS. THE CUP WAS UPSIZED AND ADDITIONAL FIXATION SCREWS WERE IMPLANTED, WHILE THE CEMENTED STEM WAS LEFT IN SITU. A DRAIN WAS PLACED IN SITU AND A VACUUM DRESSING WAS APPLIED AFTER WOUND CLOSURE. THE EXPLANTED COMPONENTS INCLUDED: LINER #M FOR MOB. LINER Ø40 (PRODUCT CODE 5885.09.040, LOT 2516684, STER. N. (B)(4). DELTA-TT CUP - ACETABULAR CUP DIA.52 MM (LINER #MEDIUM) (PRODUCT CODE 5552.15.520, LOT 2422342, STER. N. (B)(4). MOBILE LINER ØINT 28 MM Ø40 MM (PRODUCT CODE 5566.50.401, LOT 25AT2ZC, STER. N. (B)(4) IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD MULTIPLE REVISION SURGERIES SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR. PREVIOUS SURGERY WAS A REVISION DUE TO FRACTURE AND PERFORMED ON (B)(6) WHERE MOBILE LINER WAS IMPLANTED. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) WHERE THE LINER FOR MOBILE L

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24531026 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 20, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    HIP REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026 DUE TO PAIN. THE PATIENT HAD INCREASING HIP PAIN AND MRI FINDINGS SHOWING A FLUID COLLECTION AROUND THE HIP. ASPIRATION OF THE FLUID SHOWED COBALT AND CHROMIUM (COCR) METAL IONS, WHICH LED THE SURGEON TO DECIDE TO REPLACE THE COCR DUAL MOBILITY BEARING. DURING SURGERY, AFTER EXPOSURE, THE MOBILE LINER AND FEMORAL HEAD WERE REMOVED. THE SURGEON THEN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE COCR DUAL MOBILITY LINER BUT WAS NOT ABLE TO FREE IT AFTER APPROXIMATELY 10 MINUTES OF TRYING, DESPITE USING A PUNCH TO KNOCK THE RIM OF THE SHELL AND A SUCTION CUP EXTRACTION DEVICE. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO EXPLANT THE CUP WITH THE COCR DM LINER STILL IN SITU AND REPLACE IT WITH A REVISION CONSTRUCT FROM ANOTHER COMPANY. IN HIS REMARKS, THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT REMOVAL OF THE COCR DUAL MOBILITY LINER WAS VERY DIFFICULT AND THAT HE WOULD HAVE PREFERRED TO REMOVE IT AND REPLACE IT WITH AN XL PE LINER. HE ALSO INDICATED THAT DOES NOT ALLOW PHOTOS OF X RAYS OR BLOOD TEST RESULTS TO BE TAKEN, NOR DOES HE ALLOW EXPLANTED IMPLANTS TO BE RETRIEVED BY THE COMPANY. THE EXPLANTED COMPONENTS INCLUDED: LINER #M FOR MOB. LINER Ø40 (PRODUCT CODE 5885.09.040, LOT 2014876, STER. N

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 24401858 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Porous devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal/Polymer, Porous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page