Pacific™ Plus PCP060120130Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · CATH PCP060120130 PCP D6.00 L 120 UL 130 · Class 2
All models of Pacific Plus (25)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08033477054902), received between Jul 25, 2017 and Jul 25, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Inflation Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 25, 2017Inflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Inflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO USE A PACIFIC PLUS DURING PROCEDURE FOR TREATMENT OF THE MID COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. THE FIBROUS LESION EXHIBITED LITTLE TORTUOSITY, NO CALCIFICATION WITH 70% STENOSIS. ARTERY DIAMETER IS REPORTED TO BE 7MM WITH A LESION LENGTH OF 120MM. IT IS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A TUMOR THAT COMPRESSED THE ARTERY. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED USING A NON-MEDTRONIC INFLATION DEVICE, AND 50/50 CONTRAST/SALINE WAS USED. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE PACKAGING. THERE WERE NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP/TRAY. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. IT IS REPORTED THAT BALLOON INFLATION DIFFICULTIES OCCURRED. THE EVENT WAS NOT OBSERVED DURING BALLOON INFLATION. IT IS REPORTED THAT 2ND INFLATION WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. WHEN NEGATIVE WAS PULLED ON THE DEVICE, BLOOD WAS PRESENT IN THE INFLATOR. THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE BALLOON AND OBSERVED THE BALLOON WAS NO LONGER ON THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN IMAGED THE ANATOMY AND FOUND THE BALLOON SLEEVE INSIDE THE SHEATH. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE SHEATH AND MAINTAIN WIRE ACCESS TO REMOVE THE BALLOON PIECE. IT IS REPORTED THAT 4 ATM WAS APPLIED WHEN IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THERE WAS INFLATION DIFFICULTI
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6742377 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page