Skip to content

Pacific™ Plus PCP030020180Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · CATH PCP030020180 PCP D3.00 L 20 UL 1800 · Class 2

All models of Pacific Plus (25)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08033477055121), received between Apr 19, 2021 and Apr 19, 2021 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2021Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A HAWKONE ATHERECTOMY DEVICE WITH A 6FR NON-MEDTRONIC SHEATH AND 0.014 NON-MEDTRONIC GUIDEWIRE DURING TREATMENT OF A 10MM CALCIFIED LESION IN THE PATIENT¿S MID RIGHT ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY OF REPORTED DIAMETER 3MM. MODERATE VESSEL CALCIFICATION IS REPORTED. LESION EXHIBITED 90% STENOSIS. IFU WAS FOLLOWED AND THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED WITHOUT ISSUE. IT IS REPORTED SEVERE RESISTANCE WAS NOTED DURING INITIAL ADVANCEMENT AND THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO CROSS. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AND PRE-DILATION WAS PERFORMED USING A PACIFIC PLUS PTA BALLOON WHICH WAS PREPPED AS PER IFU WITHOUT ISSUE. AN INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED WITH 50/50 SALINE CONTRAST SOLUTION FOR BALLOON INFLATION. NO RESISTANCE WAS NOTED DURING ADVANCEMENT AND THE DEVICE WAS NOT PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. THE HAWKONE DEVICE WAS REINSERTED AND 3-4 PASSES WERE MADE. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE HAWK, RESISTANCE WAS FELT WHEN DEVICE WAS IN SHEATH. WHEN HAWK WAS PULLED OUT, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE MEC WAS MISSING. UNDER FLUORO THE MEC WAS SEEN INSIDE THE SHEATH. THE WIRE WAS REMOVED AND THE ENTIRE MEC WAS REMOVED. IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE WIRE WAS LOOPED AROUND THE MEC. ANOTHER WIRE DELIV

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11684417 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page