DIGITALIS Spacer MCP – SIZE 4Recalls & reported problems
Brm Extremities Srl · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08057717554540), received between Oct 8, 2024 and Oct 8, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient-Device Incompatibility” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Patient-Device Incompatibility2
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 8, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE PATIENT IS A 73-YEAR-OLD MALE WHO PREVIOUSLY HAD AN EXTENSOR TENDON REALIGNMENT AND SUBSEQUENTLY HAS WORSENING OF HIS ARTHRITIS. HE WAS SUBMITTED TO MP JOINT SILICONE ARTHROPLASTIES AND EXTENSOR TENDON REALIGNMENT TO 4 FINGERS OF THE LEFT HAND (INDEX, LONG, RING AND SMALL FINGER. THE SURGICAL INTERVENTION HAPPENED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE OPERATING PROCEDURE STATES THAT THE EXTENSOR TENDONS TO THE LONG, RING AND SMALL FINGER, EDC AND EDM WERE DENSELY STUCK IN SCAR TISSUE FROM PRIOR SURGERY, SO THE SURGEON HAD TO PERFORM AN EXTENSIVE TENOLYSIS ON ALL FOUR TENDONS. THE IMPLANTS WERE THEN IMPLANTED. A WEEK AFTER SURGERY, THE PATIENT STATES THAT ALL THE IMPLANTS ARE DISLOCATED. THE PATIENT CLAIMS USING A RIGID SPINT SINCE SURGERY. AFTER THE ANALYSIS OF THE RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION AND X-RAYS AND CONSULTATION WITH A CLINICAL EXPERT, THE MANUFACTURER IDENTIFIED SOFT TISSUE INSTABILITY AS THE REASON FOR THE DISLOCATION. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 4.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 20395101 ↗InjuryOct 8, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility
THE PATIENT IS A 73-YEAR-OLD MALE WHO PREVIOUSLY HAD AN EXTENSOR TENDON REALIGNMENT AND SUBSEQUENTLY HAS WORSENING OF HIS ARTHRITIS. HE WAS SUBMITTED TO MP JOINT SILICONE ARTHROPLASTIES AND EXTENSOR TENDON REALIGNMENT TO 4 FINGERS OF THE LEFT HAND (INDEX, LONG, RING AND SMALL FINGER. THE SURGICAL INTERVENTION HAPPENED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE OPERATING PROCEDURE STATES THAT THE EXTENSOR TENDONS TO THE LONG, RING AND SMALL FINGER, EDC AND EDM WERE DENSELY STUCK IN SCAR TISSUE FROM PRIOR SURGERY, SO THE SURGEON HAD TO PERFORM AN EXTENSIVE TENOLYSIS ON ALL FOUR TENDONS. THE IMPLANTS WERE THEN IMPLANTED. A WEEK AFTER SURGERY, THE PATIENT STATES THAT ALL THE IMPLANTS ARE DISLOCATED. THE PATIENT CLAIMS USING A RIGID SPINT SINCE SURGERY. AFTER THE ANALYSIS OF THE RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION AND X-RAYS AND CONSULTATION WITH A CLINICAL EXPERT, THE MANUFACTURER IDENTIFIED SOFT TISSUE INSTABILITY AS THE REASON FOR THE DISLOCATION. THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 4.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 20395086 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer devices
- Osteotec Silicone Finger Implant - Size 4 OSTF-4Osteotec Limited · Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer1 recall1 report
- Osteotec Silicone Finger Implant - Size 3 OSTF-3Osteotec Limited · Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer1 recall0 reports
- Osteotec Silicone Finger Implant - Size 5 OSTF-5Osteotec Limited · Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer1 recall0 reports
- NA PIP-30Stryker GmbH · PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER27 reports
- NA PIP-20Stryker GmbH · PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER21 reports
- NA MCP-30Stryker GmbH · PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER16 reports
- NA PIP-10Stryker GmbH · PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER16 reports
- NA MCP-50Stryker GmbH · PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER14 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page