Skip to content

INTERNA® NARROW IMPLANT CA D:3.3 L:10 IIPECA3310Recalls & reported problems

Biotechnology Institute Sl · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08435389813156), received between Jul 3, 2024 and May 19, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 3 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 2 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate7
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection5
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available3
  • Bruxism2
  • High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension2
  • Inflammation2
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 19, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2025 AND 4 MONTHS LATER IT WAS NOTED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT OSSEOINTEGRATED. PATIENT WITH BONE QUALITY III. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: BONE LOSS.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 25213924 ↗
  • InjuryOct 22, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2022 AND LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION OCCURS. PATIENT WITH BONE QUALITY II. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: BONE LOSS AND PAIN.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 23355980 ↗
  • InjuryJan 7, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2024 AND 2 MONTHS LATER IT WAS NOTED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT OSSEOINTEGRATED. PATIENT WITH BONE QUALITY III. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: BONE LOSS.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 21090053 ↗
  • InjuryNov 20, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2023 AND 2-MONTHS LATER IT WAS NOTED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT OSSEOINTEGRATED. PATIENT WITH BONE QUALITY II. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20732390 ↗
  • InjuryNov 20, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2023 AND 2 MONTHS LATER IT WAS NOTED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT OSSEOINTEGRATED. PATIENT WITH BONE QUALITY II. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20732383 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2020 AND, DURING THE SECOND SURGERY (FOUR MONTHS LATER) IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT OSSEOINTEGRATED. PATIENT WITH A BONE QUALITY IV. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION AND PAIN.

    Patient problems: Bruxism; High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension; Inflammation; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19666449 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2020 AND, DURING THE SECOND SURGERY (FOUR MONTHS LATER) IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT OSSEOINTEGRATED. PATIENT WITH A BONE QUALITY IV. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION AND BONE LOSS.

    Patient problems: Bruxism; High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension; Inflammation; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19666245 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2019 AND ONE MONTH LATER IT WAS NOTED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT OSSEOINTEGRATED. PATIENT WITH BONE QUALITY II. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 19665067 ↗

Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices

All Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page