Skip to content

INTERNA® NARROW IMPLANT CA D:3.3 L:7.5 IIPECA3375Recalls & reported problems

Biotechnology Institute Sl · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08435389813460), received between Feb 26, 2025 and Sep 15, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate3
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 15, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    The clinician indicates that she/he placed the implant on (b)(6) 2026 and 2 months later it was noted that the implant had not osseointegrated. Patient with bone quality II. No complications were reported during or after the operation for the patient.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50770273 ↗
  • InjuryDec 29, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2025 AND 1 MONTH LATER IT WAS NOTED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT OSSEOINTEGRATED. PATIENT WITH BONE QUALITY III. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: BONE LOSS.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 23904403 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2025 AND 4 MONTHS LATER IT WAS NOTED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD NOT OSSEOINTEGRATED. PATIENT WITH BONE QUALITY IV. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: BONE LOSS.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 22584833 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE CLINICIAN INDICATES THAT HE PLACED THE IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2024 AND LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION OCCURS. PATIENT WITH BONE QUALITY II. IN THE EVENT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED: BONE LOSS.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 21468701 ↗

Other Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices

All Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page