Skip to content

KLOCKNER 18 35 10Recalls & reported problems

Soadco, S.L. · VEGA NV Ø3.5 X 10MM IMPLANT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08435451606839), received between Jun 18, 2025 and Jun 18, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Implant Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    AT THE DATE OF PREPARATION OF THE REPORT IT HAS NOT BEEN POSSIBLE TO HAVE THE DENTAL IMPLANT AVAILABLE FOR TECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND, IN ADDITION, THE MANUFACTURER OF THE PROSTHESIS IS UNKNOWN, SO IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAKE A HISTORY OF THE MATERIAL USED. THE DATA AVAILABLE TO DATE ARE THOSE RECORDED IN INCIDENT (B)(4) OF THE SAME DR. WITH A SIMILAR IMPLANT (18 35 12 LOT 26772-1124) AND THE DATA RECORDED IN THE QUALITY REPORT WHERE IT IS SPECIFIED THAT THE PATIENT IS A BRUXIST. AS HAS BEEN REFLECTED IN THIS INCIDENT, IF THE SEATING OF THE PROSTHESIS DOES NOT PRESENT THE FIT TOLERANCES AT THE IMPLANT-PROSTHESIS INTERFACE ESTABLISHED BY KLOCKNER® IMPLANT SYTEM, MICRO-MOVEMENTS ARE GENERATED BETWEEN BOTH SURFACES THAT WILL INDIRECTLY INDUCE A LOCALIZED OVERLOAD ON THE IMPLANT WITH EACH MASTICATION. THIS OVERLOAD WILL GENERATE A FRICTION AT THE IMPLANT-PROSTHESIS INTERFACE, WHICH WILL INDUCE A DEFECT ON THE IMPLANT SURFACE. THE SUCCESSIVE MASTICATORY LOADS WILL INDUCE THIS DEFECT TO START ITS PROPAGATION AND CONSEQUENTLY THE FAILURE OF THE IMPLANT.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 22284585 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page