Contour VL™ M006180155010Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Variable Length Ureteral Stent Set · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Contour VL (12)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729058427), received between Feb 18, 2022 and Jul 15, 2024 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Split, Cut or Torn4
- Break2
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress2
- Difficult to Advance2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 15, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY PROCEDURE, A CONTOUR VL STENT WAS USED. IT WAS FOUND THAT THE TIP OF THE BLADDER SIDE WAS TORN WHEN ADVANCING THE PUSHER FOR STENT PLACEMENT. ANOTHER OF THE SAME STENT WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE NOTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19744307 ↗MalfunctionJul 12, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY, A CONTOUR VL STENT WAS USED. IT WAS FOUND THAT THE TIP OF THE BLADDER SIDE WAS TORN WHEN ADVANCING THE PUSHER FOR STENT PLACEMENT. ANOTHER OF THE SAME STENT WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE NOTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19735419 ↗MalfunctionDec 13, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A CONTOUR VL URETERAL STENT WAS OPENED TO BE USED DURING A STONE LASER CASE PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. DURING PREPARATION, WHEN THE DEVICE WAS UNPACKED, THE STENT WAS FOUND BROKEN IN TWO PIECES. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER CONTOUR VL URETERAL STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE FINE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18320682 ↗MalfunctionJul 8, 2022Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A CONTOUR VL URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING A REMOVAL OF KIDNEY STONES PROCEDURE IN THE RIGHT KIDNEY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE STENT WAS INTRODUCED AND PASSED THROUGH THE URETHRA AND ENTERED THE FORCED OF TWO CENTIMETERS INTO THE URETER, AND WHEN THE STENT WAS PUSHED, IT BECAME BUCKLED AND WOULD NOT ADVANCE INTO THE URETER AND A TORN WAS OBSERVED ON THE DISTAL PART. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER CONTOUR VL URETERAL STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14955455 ↗MalfunctionJul 7, 2022Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Material Split, Cut or Torn
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A CONTOUR VL URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING A REMOVAL OF KIDNEY STONES PROCEDURE IN THE RIGHT KIDNEY PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE STENT WAS INTRODUCED AND PASSED THROUGH THE URETHRA AND ENTERED THE FORCED OF TWO CENTIMETERS INTO THE URETER, AND WHEN THE STENT WAS PUSHED, IT BECAME BUCKLED AND WOULD NOT ADVANCE INTO THE URETER AND A TORN WAS OBSERVED ON THE DISTAL PART. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER CONTOUR VL URETERAL STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14950119 ↗MalfunctionFeb 18, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A CONTOUR VL URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE URETER. THE EVENT DATE WAS NOT REPORTED. DURING PREPARATION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CONTOUR VL URETERAL STENT WAS FOUND SEPARATED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER CONTOUR VL URETERAL STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE AS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13559738 ↗
Other STENT, URETERAL devices
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL1 recall100 reports
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL122 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL118 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL108 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent 778626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL100 reports
- Percuflex™ Plus M0061752530Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 death99 reports
- Contour VL™ M0061801560Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 recall45 reports
- Polaris™ Ultra M0061921330Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL71 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page