Skip to content

Polaris™ Ultra M0061921240Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Ureteral Stent · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Polaris Ultra (40)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729124344), received between Mar 12, 2019 and May 22, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2026Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL SENT WAS USED IN A RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY (RIRS) PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE END OF THE STENT WAS DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL SHAPE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER SAME MODEL AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25260063 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 14, 2026Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS USED IN A URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE IN THE KIDNEY. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS NOT GOING OVER THE WIRE AND IT WAS NOTICED THAT IT WAS BUCKLING AT THE URETERAL OPENING. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER STENT AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24868488 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2021Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO INSERT THE POLARIS ULTRA STENT, THE STENT BROKE. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED SEVERAL TIMES WITH STENT SHEATH CONTINUOUSLY BREAKING. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS REPORTED IF A NEW STENT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A MINOR INJURY TO PATIENT OR STAFF. NO TREATMENT WAS REPORTED TO THE PATIENT OR STAFF. ** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON (B)(6), 2021 ** ANOTHER POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS OPENED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11622967 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS ULTRA STENT WAS TO BE USED IN A URETEROSCOPY (URS) PROCEDURE TO BE PERFORMED IN THE URETER, ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING PREPARATION, OUTSIDE THE PATIENT, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT WAS BROKEN AT THE MIDDLE PART OF THE STENT. THIS WAS NOTICED WHILE THE DEVICE WAS STILL IN ITS PACKAGING.THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8414919 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page