Skip to content

Polaris™ Ultra M006192133090Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Ureteral Stent Set · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Polaris Ultra (40)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729124450), received between Nov 14, 2017 and Sep 22, 2026 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Difficult to Advance3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Defective Device1
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 22, 2026Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance

    It was reported that a Polaris Ultra Ureteral stent was used in a Flexible Ureteroscopy procedure in the kidney. During insertion, the stent would not advance through the guidewire, and it was noticed that the stent was crumpled. The procedure was completed with another of the same device and there were no patient complications reported.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50856103 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 29, 2024Defective Device; Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Defective Device; Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING THE PROCEDURE USING A POLARIS ULTRA STENT, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT WAS FOUND DAMAGED. ANOTHER OF THE SAME STENT WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19857607 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 25, 2023Difficult to Advance; Material Deformation; Difficult to Advance; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING A URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE TO TREAT STONES IN THE URETER PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. DURING INSERTION, THEY HAD DIFFICULTY PASSING THE STENT THROUGH THE GUIDEWIRE AND THE STENT WAS FOUND KINKED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18002634 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2022Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING A STENT REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE URETER, PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT SHAFT WAS DETACHED OR SEPARATED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15611286 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 27, 2022Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING A URETERAL STENT IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE IN THE URETER, PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. AFTER THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN DEPLOYED THE STENT, IT WAS NOTICED UNDER A CYSTOSCOPE THAT THE PIGTAIL WAS TORN. THE STENT WAS REMOVED AND ANOTHER POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS OPENED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14835343 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 28, 2021Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WITH .035IN DF SENSOR WAS USED DURING A TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY FOR THE LEFT SIDE PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE BECAME SEPARATED DUE TO LASER RADIATION. PHOTOS OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE SHOWED THAT THE CORE WIRE WAS BROKEN. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT TO DATE, DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11901201 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 14, 2017Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS ULTRA STENT WAS USED IN THE URETER DURING A URETERAL STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING UNPACKING, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT WAS SEPARATED INTO TWO FROM THE CENTER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7030418 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page