Skip to content

Polaris™ Ultra M0061921430Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Ureteral Stent · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Polaris Ultra (40)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729124566), received between Nov 28, 2018 and Sep 23, 2026 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Defective Device1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Difficult to Advance1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    It was reported that a Polaris Ultra Ureteral stent was used in a Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) procedure in the ureter. During procedure and inside the patient, when attempted to cut the suture, the tip at the end broke. The procedure was completed with another of the same device and there were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50870663 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 5, 2025Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS TO BE USED IN A URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE IN THE URETER. DURING PREPARATION, A RED SPOT WAS FOUND ON THE BLADDER SIDE OF THE STENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER SAME DEVICE AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22980049 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 12, 2024Defective Device; Difficult to Advance; Defective Device; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT DID NOT THREAD WITH THE WIRE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT WAS DAMAGED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME STENT AND NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE IDENTIFIED A STENT BUCKLED MATERIAL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19522775 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 26, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING A PLANNED PROCEDURE IN THE RIGHT URETER PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. DURING PREPARATION, WHEN THE DEVICE WAS UNPACKED, THE STENT WAS FOUND BROKEN INTO TWO PIECES ALONG THE SHAFT. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE. A PHOTO OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS PROVIDED AND SHOWED THAT THE DISTAL END OF THE STENT SHAFT WAS BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18017232 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 6, 2020Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING A URETERAL CATHETERIZATION VIA CYSTOSCOPE PROCEDURE IN THE BLADDER, PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN UNPACKED THE PACKAGE, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS FRACTURED. ANOTHER POLARIS ULTRA STENT WAS OPENED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10233466 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 24, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS ULTRA STENT WAS TO BE USED FOR A URETEROSCOPY (URS) PROCEDURE, TO BE PERFORMED IN THE URETER, ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING PREPARATION, THE STENT BROKE IN HALF ALONG THE SHAFT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER POLARIS ULTRA STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE CONDITION OF THE PATIENT AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8274690 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 28, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS ULTRA STENT WAS UNPACKED FOR USE FOR A URETERAL STENTING PROCEDURE TO BE PERFORMED IN THE LEFT URETER ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING PREPARATION, THE SUTURE WAS REMOVED AND THE STENT WAS NOTICED TO BE DAMAGED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT WAS DAMAGED BY SCISSORS WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE SUTURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER POLARIS ULTRA STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE CONDITION OF THE PATIENT AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD. THIS EVENT HAS BEEN DEEMED A REPORTABLE EVENT BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION RESULTS; STENT BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8113331 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page