Skip to content

Percuflex™ Plus M006175263080Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Ureteral Stent Set · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Percuflex Plus (35)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729297420), received between Apr 30, 2018 and Apr 30, 2018 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 30, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A PERCUFLEX¿ PLUS STENT HAS TO BE USED IN A PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING UNPACKING, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS FOUND TO BE BENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER PERCUFLEX¿ PLUS STENT KIT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THIS EVENT HAS BEEN DEEMED AN MDR-REPORTABLE EVENT BASED ON INVESTIGATION RESULTS WHICH REVEALED THAT THE GUIDEWIRES¿ CORE WIRE WAS BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7474317 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page