WALLSTENT™ RP Endoprosthesis M001712320Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Self-Expanding Stent · Class 3
All models of WALLSTENT RP Endoprosthesis (19)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729345862), received between Aug 21, 2017 and Apr 6, 2018 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Bent” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Bent1
- Entrapment of Device1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 6, 2018Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CATHETER ENTRAPMENT OCCURRED. THE 90% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. A 10X20X75MM WALLSTENT¿ RP ENDOPROSTHESIS WAS DEPLOYED TO THE LESION. HOWEVER, A NON-BSC GUIDE WIRE BECAME STUCK WITH THE GUIDE WIRE LUMEN. THE GUIDE WIRE WAS REMOVED AND A "YELLOW OBJECT" PART OF THE WALL WAS NOTED STICKING TO THE GUIDE WIRE. THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED DUE TO INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS NOR INJURIES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7403861 ↗InjuryAug 21, 2017Bent; Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT FORESHORTENING OCCURRED. THE 90% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS CEPHALIC VEIN. A 10X20X75 WALLSTENT¿ RP ENDOPROSTHESIS WAS SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOYED HOWEVER; IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT HAD FORESHORTENED. A 8X38 WALLSTENT¿ RP ENDOPROSTHESIS WAS DEPLOYED TO FULLY COVER THE LESION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS GOOD.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6807944 ↗
Other STENT, ILIAC devices
- Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control Vascular Stent System C10040MLCordis US Corp. · STENT, ILIAC1 recall3 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012534-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC51 reports
- Protégé™ GPS™ SERB65-09-60-80Ev3, Inc · STENT, ILIAC1 recall0 reports
- Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control Vascular Stent System C09060MLCordis US Corp. · STENT, ILIAC1 recall0 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012535-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC1 death41 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012631-39Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC27 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012632-29Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC25 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012536-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC21 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page