Mach1™ H74934356680Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Guide Catheter · Class 2
All models of Mach1 (28)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729351955), received between Aug 21, 2024 and Aug 21, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- Vascular Dissection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 21, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DISSECTION OCCURRED, REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS OBTAINED VIA THE RIGHT RADIAL ARTERY. THE 85% STENOSED, 4.0-4.5MMX53MM, ECCENTRIC, DE NOVO TARGET LESION WITH A BEND OF >45 AND <90 DEGREES WAS LOCATED IN THE SEVERELY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED MIDDLE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). AN OPTICROSS IMAGING CATHETER WAS USED TO STUDY THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE LESION. AFTER A MACH1 JR 4 6F GUIDE-CATHETER WAS ENGAGED COAXIALLY AND A SAMURAI GUIDEWIRE CROSSED THE LESION, PRE-DILATION WAS PERFORMED WITH A 3.50MM X 15MM EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER. WITH THE HELP OF 6F GUIDEZILLA LONG CATHETER-GUIDE EXTENSION, A 4.0MM X 20MM SYNERGY XD DRUG-ELUTING STENT (DES) WAS DEPLOYED. A 4.0MM X 12MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS THEN USED FOR POST DILATION. USING THE SAME OPTICROSS DEVICE, THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT A TYPE E DISSECTION HAD OCCURRED FROM THE PROXIMAL TO THE OSTIAL PART OF THE RCA. THE DISSECTION WAS CONSIDERED TO HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY THE GUIDEZILLA AND MACH1 CATHETERS. WHEN THEY WERE USED RESISTANCE WAS FELT, AND THE DEVICES WERE ENGAGED DEEPLY INTO THE RCA CAUSING THE DISSECTION. THE
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 20021026 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page