Mach1™ H74934358480Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Guide Catheter · Class 2
All models of Mach1 (28)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729382775), received between Sep 3, 2018 and Sep 3, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Integrity Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Integrity Problem1
Patient problems
- Bradycardia1
- Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 3, 2018Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DECREASE IN BLOOD PRESSURE AND BRADYCARDIA OCCURRED. THE 99% STENOSED, 15MM IN LENGTH, 3.5MM IN DIAMETER TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A MILDLY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE PROXIMAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. A MACH 1 GUIDE CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI), ABLATION WAS PERFORMED USING 1.75MM ROTALINK PLUS BURR OVER A ROTAWIRE. ABLATION WAS PERFORMED THREE TIMES AT 205,000 RPM FOR A DURATION OF 10 SECONDS WITHOUT STAYING IN ONE PLACE. HOWEVER, WHEN THE 1.75MM BURR WAS REMOVED INTO THE GUIDE CATHETER THE BLOOD PRESSURE DECREASED AND BRADYCARDIA OCCURRED. THE SYMPTOMS WERE IMPROVED BY DRUG ADMINISTRATION. ACCORDING TO THE PHYSICIAN, THE CAUSE OF THE BLOOD PRESSURE DECREASE AND BRADYCARDIA MIGHT BE THE ABLATED DEBRIS THAT FLOWED TO THE PERIPHERY. THERE WAS SOME DAMAGE OBSERVED WITHIN THE INNER LUMEN OF THE GUIDE CATHETER, BUT THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT THINK THIS CONTRIBUTED TO THE PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME DEVICE. THE PATIENT'S CURRENT CONDITION IS GOOD.
Patient problems: Bradycardia; Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension
MAUDE report 7840514 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page