Skip to content

Express® LD Iliac / Biliary H74938046102070Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Premounted Stent System · Class 3

All models of Express LD Iliac / Biliary (34)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729392071), received between Mar 6, 2020 and May 7, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture2
  • Activation Failure1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Entrapment of Device1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Vascular Dissection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 7, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THIS 10.0X30X75CM EXPRESS LD STENT WAS SELECTED FOR USE ON A CANINE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, ONCE THE STENT WAS EXPANDED, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON POPPED FAR BELOW THE BURST PRESSURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21980577 ↗
  • InjuryMay 2, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DISLODGEMENT OCCURRED, REQUIRING ADDITIONAL DEVICE FOR REMOVAL. A 10.0X30X75CM EXPRESS LD STENT WAS SELECTED FOR STENTING THE SUPERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY. HOWEVER, THE STENT NOTED TO BE OFF CATHETER, BUT STILL ON THE WIRE. SNARE WAS USED TO REMOVED THE STENT FROM THE PATIENT AND NOTED TO BE INTACT. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19234945 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 9, 2024

    STENT NOTED TO BE OFF CATHETER, BUT STILL ON THE WIRE. SNARE USED TO REMOVE STENT FROM THE PATIENT AND NOTED TO BE INTACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19069865 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2023Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT CATHETER ENTRAPMENT ON GUIDEWIRE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN ILIAC ARTERY. A 10.0X30X75CM EXPRESS LD ILIAC / BILIARY STENT WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS STUCK ON THE WIRE. THE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND THE WIRE WERE REMOVED AS A WHOLE ALL TOGETHER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXPRESS LD STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS NOR INJURIES REPORTED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED VIA ATTACHED FACILITY MEDWATCH REPORT 3600510000-2023-8002, THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED WITH ABDOMINAL ANGIOGRAM WITH RUNOFF AND POSSIBLE PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA). THE STENT WAS STUCK ON 035 AMPLATZ PLATINUM WIRE AND FAILED TO DEPLOY. THE PATIENT CONDITION WAS STABLE POST-PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16404967 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2020Material Rupture; Activation Failure; Material Rupture; Activation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE, STENT INADEQUATE APPOSITION, AND VESSEL DISSECTION OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC VESSEL. FOLLOWING PRE-DILATATION WITH AN 8X40 BALLOON, A 10.0X30X75CM EXPRESS LD ILIAC / BILIARY STENT WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, UPON INFLATING THE BALLOON INSIDE THE STENT, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE BALLOON WAS PULLED OUT. THE STENT WAS NOTED TO BE DOG-BONED, WHICH COULD NOT FULLY INFLATE THE STENT. ANOTHER NON-BSC BALLOON WAS USED TO POST DILATE THE STENT. THERE WAS A SLIGHT DISSECTION NOTED FROM THE COMMON ILIAC TOWARDS THE AORTA AND THE PHYSICIAN POST DILATED IT AGAIN WITH THE NON-BSC BALLOON. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT DID GOOD.

    Patient problems: Vascular Dissection

    MAUDE report 9799961 ↗

Other STENT, ILIAC devices

All STENT, ILIAC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page