Skip to content

Express® LD Iliac / Biliary H74938046920750Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Premounted Stent System · Class 3

All models of Express LD Iliac / Biliary (34)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729392316), received between Aug 1, 2017 and Apr 12, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
  • Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Packaging Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 12, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DISLODGEMENT OCCURRED. A 9.0X30X75CM EXPRESS LD ILIAC / BILIARY STENT BALLOON WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, DURING THE PREPARATION, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE STENT WAS NOT ATTACHED TO THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WHEN PULLING OUT FROM THE LOOP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19101418 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2019Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Packaging Problem; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Packaging Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEVICE STERILITY WAS COMPROMISED. IT WAS OBSERVED THAT AN EXPRESS LD ILIAC / BILIARY STENT PRODUCT BOX AND DEVICE PACKAGE WAS RECEIVED DAMAGED AND THE PRODUCT POUCH WAS COMPROMISED.THE EXPRESS STENT WAS NOT USED FOR A PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9244391 ↗
  • InjuryNov 2, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DISLODGMENT OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. A 9.0X30X75CM STENT WAS ADVANCED BUT DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO CROSS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED STENT. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO PUSH THE DEVICE THROUGH THE PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED STENT AND DEVICE GOT CAUGHT WITH IMPLANTED STENT THEN THE STENT STARTED TO SLIDE OFF THE BALLOON. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO RE-INTRODUCE THE SAME DEVICE. AFTER THE DEVICE WOULD NOT CROSS THE AFFECTED LESION, THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO PULL THE DEVICE OUT OF THE PATIENT'S BODY BUT THE DEVICE GOT CAUGHT ON THE SHEATH AND THE STENT COMPLETELY SLID OFF THE BALLOON. AN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE DISLODGED STENT WAS MADE BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE BALLOON WAS THEN RE-INSERTED INTO THE LUMEN OF THE DISLODGED STENT AND DEPLOYED IN A DIFFERENT SECTION IN THE ILIAC ARTERY. A NON-BSC STENT WAS ADVANCED BUT STILL FAILED WITH THE SAME RESULT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS FINE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6997626 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STENT DISLODGED AND MIGRATED INSIDE THE PATIENT REQUIRING SURGERY. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT ILIAC ARTERY. AFTER A 7FR SHEATH WAS INSERTED, A 9.0X30X75CM EXPRESS® LD ILIAC / BILIARY STENT WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, DURING ADVANCEMENT THROUGH THE STENOSIS, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO PULL THE DEVICE BACK BUT THE STENT DISLODGED FROM THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO RETRIEVE THE DISLODGED STENT WITH A SNARE BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL AND THE STENT MIGRATED TO THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. THE PATIENT WAS THEN SENT FOR SURGERY AND THE DISLODGED STENT WAS REMOVED BY A VASCULAR SURGEON. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS IN SATISFACTORY CONDITION, UPON COMPLETION OF THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6756341 ↗

Other STENT, ILIAC devices

All STENT, ILIAC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page