Quantum™ Maverick™ H7493808008250Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTCA Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Quantum Maverick (36)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729392545), received between Nov 18, 2016 and Aug 8, 2022 — classified as 11 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (4 reports).
5 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P860019); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Advance4
- Break3
- Material Rupture2
- Contamination1
- Kinked1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient8
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 8, 2022Contamination; Contamination
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CONTAMINATION OCCURRED. A 2.5MM X 8MM QUANTUM MAVERICK BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY. HOWEVER, DURING UNPACKING OF THE DEVICE, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE BALLOON WAS NOT SEALED AND THE STERILITY OF THE INNER POUCH WAS COMPROMISED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT STATUS WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15186357 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2021Material Rupture; Material Rupture
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
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11638532 ↗MalfunctionJan 7, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE 85% STENOSED, 20-22MM IN LENGTH, 2.5-2.75MM IN VESSEL DIAMETER, TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MILDLY CALCIFIED LEFT CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY. A 2.5MM X 8MM QUANTUM MAVERICK BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. HOWEVER, DURING THE FIRST INFLATION, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS NOR INJURIES REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9560571 ↗MalfunctionOct 23, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. DURING UNPACKING OF A 2.5MM X 8MM QUANTUM MAVERICK BALLOON CATHETER, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON WAS FRACTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9227027 ↗MalfunctionAug 20, 2018Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 03-AUG-2018. IT WAS REPORTED THAT CROSSING DIFFICULTIES WERE ENCOUNTERED. THE 96% STENOSED, 8MMX2.5MM TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE SEVERELY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED LEFT CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY. A 2.5MM X 8MM QUANTUM¿ MAVERICK¿ BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED BUT FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS STABLE. HOWEVER, RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED HYPOTUBE BREAK.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7797829 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2018Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2018. IT WAS REPORTED THAT CROSSING DIFFICULTIES WERE ENCOUNTERED. THE STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A CORONARY ARTERY. A 2.5MM X 8MM QUANTUM MAVERICK BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED BUT FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE. HOWEVER, RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED HYPOTUBE BREAK.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7720456 ↗MalfunctionNov 29, 2017Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2017. IT WAS REPORTED THAT CROSSING DIFFICULTIES WERE ENCOUNTERED. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS OBTAINED VIA THE FEMORAL ARTERY. THE 90% STENOSED, 20X2.75MM, CONCENTRIC, DE NOVO TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). A 2.5MM X 8MM QUANTUM¿ MAVERICK¿ BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED BUT FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE. HOWEVER, RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED A HYPOTUBE BREAK.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7068038 ↗MalfunctionJun 21, 2017Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. THE 75% STENOSED, 7X2.5MM TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY (LAD). A 2.5MM X 8MM BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. HOWEVER, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON SHAFT WAS FRACTURED. THE DEVICE WAS SIMPLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6657940 ↗MalfunctionMay 4, 2017Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. THE 6 X 2.5 MM, 75% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY. A 2.5 MM X 8 MM QUANTUM¿ MAVERICK¿ BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION; HOWEVER, THE SHAFT WAS FRACTURED ABOUT 20 CM FROM THE HUB. THE DEVICE WAS SIMPLY REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT HARM OR COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6544707 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2016Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 16-NOV-2016. IT WAS REPORTED THAT CROSSING DIFFICULTIES WERE ENCOUNTERED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A CORONARY ARTERY. A 2.5MM X 8MM QUANTUM¿ MAVERICK¿ BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED BUT FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE. HOWEVER, RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED HYPOTUBE BREAK.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6143485 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2016Kinked; Kinked
IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE MAY HAVE BEEN FRACTURED UPON REMOVAL. IT WAS SIMPLY REMOVED THE DEVICE FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6113499 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P860019. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2165-2008 · May 1, 2007 · TerminatedBoston Scientific Scimed Maverick 2 Monorail" PTCA Catheter, 3.0 mm 15 mm REF 38928-1530 Lot 9565194 Use before 2010-04 Indicated for balloon dilation of the stenotic portion o
- Z-2166-2008 · Nov 1, 2005 · TerminatedBoston Scientific Scimed Maverick 2 Monorail 12mm Balloon Catheter, 2.5 mm x 12 mm Made in Ireland Ballybrit Business Park, Galway, Ireland REF 38928-1225 Use before 2007-01 UPN H
- Z-0030-04 · Aug 20, 2003 · TerminatedAce Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Dilatation Catheter with 2cm Tip 20 mm Balloon, Catalog Number H74902071011
- Z-0031-04 · Aug 20, 2003 · TerminatedAce Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Dilatation Catheter with 2cm Tip 20 mm Balloon, Catalog Number H74902071051
- Z-0032-04 · Aug 20, 2003 · TerminatedAce Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Dilatation Catheter with 1 cm Tip and 20 mm Balloon, Catalog Number H74903628151
Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous223 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892815200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 death203 reports
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous162 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892820200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous161 reports
- NC TREK 1012454-08Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 recalls59 reports
- TREK™ 1012272-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 deaths158 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall84 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall1 death83 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page