Skip to content

Polaris™ Loop M0061552310Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Ureteral Stent · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729421078), received between Aug 6, 2020 and Apr 21, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn2
  • Migration2
  • Defective Device1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Urinary Tract Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 21, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LITHOTRIPSY FOR LEFT RENAL CALCULI, A POLARIS URETERAL STENT WAS TO BE USED. AFTER UNPACKING, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE STENT WAS FRACTURED INTO TWO PARTS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24947744 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 6, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE USING A POLARIS LOOP URETERAL STENT, THE LOOP WAS BROKEN WHEN THE PHYSICIAN PUSHED THE DEVICE INTO THE BLADDER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23983542 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 3, 2025Nonstandard Device; Defective Device; Material Integrity Problem; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Nonstandard Device; Defective Device; Material Integrity Problem; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A POLARIS LOOP URETERAL STENT WAS USED IN A URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE LOOP WAS ENTANGLED WITH THE SUTURE THREAD CAUSING IT TO BREAK WHILE BEING UNTIED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23459999 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 21, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE LOOP WAS ENTANGLED WITH COTTON THREAD, CAUSING IT TO BREAK WHEN BEING UNTIED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE AND THE PATIENT CONDITION FOLLOWING PROCEDURE WAS STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22555173 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 25, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING PREPARATION PRIOR TO TRANSURETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT WAS FRACTURED. ANOTHER OF THE SAME STENT WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE CONDITION OF THE PATIENT AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20533824 ↗
  • InjuryApr 11, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS LOOP URETERAL STENT WAS IMPLANTED DURING A STENT PLACEMENT FOR STONE MANAGEMENT, LASER LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE IN THE RIGHT URETER ON (B)(6) 2022, AS PART OF THE U0652 DOUBLE-J REGISTRY CLINICAL STUDY. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED, AND A MEDICATION OF ALPHA BLOCKER, ANTIBIOTIC, AND NARCOTIC ANALGESICS (OPIOIDS) WAS GIVEN FOR THE PATIENT. ON (B)(6) 2022, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED URINARY TRACT INFECTION AND WAS HOSPITALIZED FOR NINE DAYS. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE EVENT WAS CONSIDERED RESOLVED. THERE WAS NO NEW STENT IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection

    MAUDE report 16714282 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2022Difficult to Remove; Migration; Difficult to Remove; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A POLARIS LOOP URETERAL STENT WAS IMPLANTED DURING AN URETEROSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT WAS STENTED WITH A POLARIS LOOP URETERAL STENT 6X22CM AND FOR AROUND ONE MONTH, A REMOVAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING PROCEDURE, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVED THE IMPLANTED POLARIS LOOP URETERAL STENT, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE COIL PART MIGRATED TO THE PATIENT'S URETERIC OFFICE. THEY WERE UNABLE TO REMOVE THE MIGRATED COIL WITH FORCEPS, THEREFORE THE PHYSICIAN INSERTED CYSTOSCOPE IN ORDER TO VIEW AND WAS ABLE TO REMOVED THE MIGRATED COIL SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE AS "PATIENT DOES NOT FEEL ANY UNUSUAL PAIN". THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13981930 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2022Difficult to Remove; Migration; Difficult to Remove; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A POLARIS LOOP URETERAL STENT WAS IMPLANTED DURING AN RETROGRADE INTRA RENAL SURGERY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS STENTED WITH POLARIS LOOP 6X22CM FOR AROUND 4 DAYS AND A REMOVAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING PROCEDURE, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVED THE IMPLANTED POLARIS LOOP URETERAL STENT, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE COIL PART MIGRATED TO THE PATIENT'S URETERIC OFFICE. THEY WERE UNABLE TO REMOVE THE MIGRATED COIL WITH FORCEPS, THEREFORE THE PHYSICIAN INSERTED CYSTOSCOPE IN ORDER TO VIEW AND WAS ABLE TO REMOVED THE MIGRATED COIL SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE AS "PATIENT DOES NOT FEEL ANY UNUSUAL PAIN". THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13972221 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 6, 2020Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS LOOP URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING A LITHOTOMY UNDER URETEROSCOPE PROCEDURE FOR A STONE IN THE URETER, PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING WITHDRAWAL, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THAT THE STENT WAS FRACTURED WHEN REMOVED FROM INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE FRACTURED STENT WAS PULLED OUT AND NO FRAGMENTS WERE LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. ANOTHER URETERAL STENT WAS IMPLANTED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10375894 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page