Skip to content

Contour VL™ M006180156120Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Variable Length Ureteral Stent Set · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Contour VL (12)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729423843), received between Dec 16, 2021 and Dec 13, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deformation Due to Compressive Stress” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress2
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Entrapment of Device1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2024Entrapment of Device; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Advance; Entrapment of Device; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Device-Device Incompatibility; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A URETERIC STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE A CONTOUR VL URETERAL STENT WAS USED, THE STENT WAS INSERTED OVER THE GUIDEWIRE WITH A PUSHER TO PUSH THE STENT OVER THE WIRE. IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE STENT CRIMPLED THE WIRE AND THE WIRE COULD NOT BE RETRACTED. THE STENT AND THE GUIDEWIRE WERE REMOVED BY PULLING ANTEGRADELY. ANOTHER NEW STENT AND GUIDEWIRE WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20926224 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 16, 2021Difficult to Remove; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Remove; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A CONTOUR URETERAL STENT WAS USED DURING A URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE IN THE URETER, PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN INSERTED THE STENT OVER THE GUIDEWIRE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT WAS BUCKLED. THE GUIDEWIRE BECAME JAMMED AND WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. EVENTUALLY, THE GUIDEWIRE WAS REMOVED BUT WAS BUCKLED. ANOTHER CONTOUR URETERAL STENT WAS OPENED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13022198 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page