WallFlex™ Colonic M00565090Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Stent System with Anchor Lock Delivery System · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729456568), received between Sep 16, 2019 and Jan 29, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation Failure1
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
- Material Deformation1
- Positioning Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 29, 2026Positioning Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A WALLFLEX COLONIC STENT WAS TO BE IMPLANTED TO THE COLON TO TREAT A 5CM OBSTRUCTION CAUSED BY CANCER DURING AN INTESTINAL STENTING VIA DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY (DSA) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. THE ANATOMY OF THE PATIENT WAS TORTUOUS. DURING PROCEDURE, WHEN THE MARK POINT OF THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED HALFWAY, THE STENT SUDDENLY ADVANCED INTO THE BODY OF THE PATIENT, SPECIFICALLY INTO THE INTESTINAL LUMEN, CROSSING THE STENOTIC LESION. REPORTEDLY, SLIGHT RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING THE DEPLOYMENT. DUE TO THIS EVENT, THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT COMPLETED. THE STENT WAS THEN REMOVED USING BIOPSY FORCEPS VIA COLONOSCOPY. ON (B)(6) 2026, ANOTHER WALLFLEX STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED. THERE WAS NO OTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24218363 ↗MalfunctionSep 24, 2021Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Material Deformation; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A WALLFLEX COLONIC STENT WAS TO BE IMPLANTED TO TREAT AN INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION CAUSED BY COLON TUMOR DURING A COLON STENTING PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS TORTUOUS AND WAS NOT DILATED PRIOR TO STENT PLACEMENT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE DEPLOYED; HOWEVER, THE POSITION OF THE STENT DEVIATED FROM THE TARGET LOCATION. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO RE-SHEATH THE STENT BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE STENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT PARTIALLY DEPLOYED ON THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER WALLFLEX COLONIC STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE. NOTE: THIS EVENT HAS BEEN DEEMED AN MDR REPORTABLE EVENT BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION RESULT WHICH REVEALED THE STENT WAS DAMAGED AND DEFORMED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12526147 ↗InjurySep 16, 2019Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Activation Failure; Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ON AUGUST 22, 2019 THAT A WALLFLEX COLONIC STENT HAS BEEN IMPLANTED TO TREAT A MALIGNANT STRICTURE IN THE COLON DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS TIGHT. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE STENT CATHETER WAS INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT'S COLON VIA INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. DURING DEPLOYMENT, THE PHYSICIAN FELT SOMETHING AS IF IT WAS STUCK AND HAD MORE DIFFICULTY DEPLOYING THE STENT THAN USUAL BUT THE STENT WAS ABLE TO BE DEPLOYED. AN X-RAY WAS TAKEN AND SHOWED THE STENT DID NOT FULLY EXPAND. THE STENT REMAINS IMPLANTED AND REPORTEDLY, THE PHYSICIAN AIMED TO IMPLANT A SECOND WALLFLEX COLONIC STENT WITHIN THE FIRST STENT TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9071296 ↗
Other STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE devices
- WallFlex™ Colonic M00565050Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE2 deaths63 reports
- Evolution G48028Cook Ireland Ltd · STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE45 reports
- Evolution G48038Cook Ireland Ltd · STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE45 reports
- WallFlex™ Colonic M00565060Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE2 deaths33 reports
- WallFlex™ Colonic M00565040Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE1 death23 reports
- WALLSTENT™ Enteral Endoprosthesis M00565590Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE15 reports
- WallFlex™ Colonic M00565110Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE3 deaths14 reports
- WallFlex™ Colonic M00565120Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, COLONIC, METALIC, EXPANDABLE11 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.