Mach1™ M001198380Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Guide Catheter · Class 2
All models of Mach1 (28)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729481591), received between Sep 30, 2020 and Dec 20, 2023 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Difficult to Advance1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 20, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CATHETER BREAK OCCURRED. A MACH1 GUIDE CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL 2-3CM OF THE CATHETER WAS BROKEN AND THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS UPWARD TO THE LEFT COMMON CAROTID ARTERY. THE DEVICE WAS THEN REPLACED WITH ANOTHER GUIDE CATHETER WHICH PASSED SMOOTHLY AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE TARGET LESION WAS NON-CALCIFIED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED SAFELY, AND THE PATIENT CONDITION POST PROCEDURE WAS NORMAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18364621 ↗MalfunctionSep 30, 2020Break; Difficult to Advance; Break; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE ALMOST BROKE. A MACH 1 CATHETER GUIDE WAS SELECTED FOR USE. THE INTENDED LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT CAROTID ARTERY. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN HAD DIFFICULTY MOVING THE DEVICE INSIDE THE ARTERIES. WHEN MOVING THE DEVICE, IT ALMOST BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT DUE TO THE WEAKNESS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CATHETER. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS STABLE POST PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10607257 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page