Skip to content

EndoVive Standard PEG Kit M00568210Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Kit · Class 2

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Quick summary

This Boston Scientific EndoVive Standard PEG kit is used to place a feeding tube through the stomach wall. The reports mostly describe the tube coming apart, and the guidewire getting stuck or not passing through the tube during placement, sometimes forcing the doctor to swap in another kit. There are 28 reports, with no deaths and 9 injuries. One open recall from February 2024 covers the blocked connector that stops the guidewire from advancing.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
28
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 28 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729748694), received between Aug 21, 2017 and Mar 1, 2024 — classified as 9 injuries, 19 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (15 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 4 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Feb 20, 2024Open, Classified

    Inability to advance the guidewire through the feeding tube during placement due to blocked lumen of the barb connector. May lead prolongation in the procedure to exchange the device for another leading to leading to a cascade of events which may include additional intervention to close the puncture site, bleeding, leakage of gastric contents, and aspiration

    Z-1516-2024 · Root cause: Process design · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component15
  • Obstruction of Flow8
  • Difficult to Advance5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Leak/Splash1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions24
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
  • No Code Available1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 28 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 1, 2024Unraveled Material; Obstruction of Flow; Unraveled Material; Obstruction of Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO ADVANCE THE PEG TUBE OVER THE GUIDEWIRE; HOWEVER, RESISTANCE WAS MET. HE TRIED TO WET THE GUIDEWIRE AND STRAIGHTEN THE TUBE, BUT IT WOULD NOT ADVANCE ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE PEG TUBE. EVENTUALLY, HE WAS ABLE TO GET THE TUBE THROUGH THE INCISION, BUT THE GUIDEWIRE COMPLETELY UNRAVELED IN THE PROCESS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE WAS STUCK IN THE TRANSITION ZONE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME ORIGINAL ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18820170 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 27, 2023Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE SECOND OF TWO ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE DATE IS UNKNOWN. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO PUSH THE PEG TUBE, THE GUIDEWIRE WOULD NOT PASS THROUGH AS THE HOLE WAS CLOSED AND WAY TOO SMALL FOR THE WIRE. A SECOND PEG KIT WAS OPENED AND HAD THE SAME PROBLEM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18213133 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 27, 2023Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE FIRST OF TWO ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE DATE IS UNKNOWN. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO PUSH THE PEG TUBE, THE GUIDEWIRE WOULD NOT PASS THROUGH AS THE HOLE WAS CLOSED AND WAY TOO SMALL FOR THE WIRE. A SECOND PEG KIT WAS OPENED AND HAD THE SAME PROBLEM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18213132 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 9, 2023Obstruction of Flow; Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Obstruction of Flow; Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE SECOND OF TWO ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) INSERTION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE WOULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE PEG TUBE. A SECOND PEG KIT WAS OPENED AND HAD THE SAME PROBLEM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18107051 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 9, 2023Obstruction of Flow; Difficult to Advance; Obstruction of Flow; Difficult to Advance

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE FIRST OF TWO ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) INSERTION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE WOULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE PEG TUBE. A SECOND PEG KIT WAS OPENED AND HAD THE SAME PROBLEM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18107030 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 27, 2023Obstruction of Flow; Difficult to Advance; Obstruction of Flow; Difficult to Advance

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE FIRST OF TWO ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE DATE IS UNKNOWN. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO PUSH THE PEG TUBE OVER THE WIRE, THE GUIDEWIRE WOULD NOT PASS THROUGH WHERE THE INTRODUCER MEETS THE PEG TUBE. A SECOND PEG KIT WAS OPENED AND HAD THE SAME PROBLEM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE AND NO FURTHER DEVICES WERE USED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18023291 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 6, 2023Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE FIRST OF THREE ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2023. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO PUSH THE PEG TUBE OVER THE WIRE, IT KEPT GETTING STUCK WHERE THE INTRODUCER MEETS THE PEG TUBE. AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE THE PEG TUBE WHICH WAS STUCK ON THE WIRE. THE WIRE BECAME UNRAVELED AND STRETCHED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. A SECOND PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS OPENED HOWEVER THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THE PHYSICIAN THEN USED AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PULL KIT TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. AFTER THE PROCEDURE, A THIRD ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH TUBE WITH THE SAME LOT WAS OPENED AND THE SAME THING OCCURRED WITH THE ONES USED PREVIOUSLY. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17890233 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 6, 2023Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE THIRD OF THREE ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO PUSH THE PEG TUBE OVER THE WIRE, IT KEPT GETTING STUCK WHERE THE INTRODUCER MEETS THE PEG TUBE. AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE THE PEG TUBE WHICH WAS STUCK ON THE WIRE. THE WIRE BECAME UNRAVELED AND STRETCHED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. A SECOND PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS OPENED HOWEVER THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THE PHYSICIAN THEN USED AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PULL KIT TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. AFTER THE PROCEDURE, A THIRD ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH TUBE WITH THE SAME LOT WAS OPENED AND THE SAME THING OCCURRED WITH THE ONES USED PREVIOUSLY. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17890229 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 6, 2023Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO THE SECOND OF THREE ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO PUSH THE PEG TUBE OVER THE WIRE, IT KEPT GETTING STUCK WHERE THE INTRODUCER MEETS THE PEG TUBE. AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE THE PEG TUBE WHICH WAS STUCK ON THE WIRE. THE WIRE BECAME UNRAVELED AND STRETCHED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. A SECOND PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS OPENED HOWEVER THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THE PHYSICIAN THEN USED AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PULL KIT TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. AFTER THE PROCEDURE, A THIRD ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH TUBE WITH THE SAME LOT WAS OPENED AND THE SAME THING OCCURRED WITH THE ONES USED PREVIOUSLY. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17890227 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 16, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH METHOD TUBE WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN PHYSICIAN TRIED TO PULL THROUGH THE STOMACH, THE PEG TUBE BROKE IN HALF. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15237415 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 26, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE DETACHED WHILE IT WAS PULLED THROUGH ABDOMEN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15103369 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 5, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE DETACHED AT THE TRANSITION ZONE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH SAME ORIGINAL ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14294480 ↗
  • InjuryApr 11, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE BROKE AT THE TRANSITION ZONE AS IT WAS BEING INSERTED THROUGH THE PATIENT'S MOUTH UP TO THE STOMA SITE. THE PEG TUBE HAD NOT GONE THROUGH THE STOMA AND WAS STUCK IN THE GASTRIC SIDE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DETACHED PORTION WAS ENDOSCOPICALLY RETRIEVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14074220 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 7, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY PROCEDURE (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE SEPARATED AT THE CONNECTOR WHILE PHYSICIAN WAS PULLING IT THROUGH THE ABDOMEN. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO ADVANCE THE TUBE UTILIZING SURGICAL FORCEPS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THIS DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13193089 ↗
  • InjuryDec 8, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) TUBE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING PROCEDURE, WHEN PHYSICIAN WAS PULLING THE PEG TUBE THROUGH THE INCISION, IT BROKE. THE PHYSICIAN RETRIEVED THE TUBE AND PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. IT WAS REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO A PATIENT THAT WAS IN THE ICU. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12960351 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 8, 2021Leak/Splash; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Leak/Splash; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PEG TUBE WAS LEAKING ENTERAL FEEDING NUTRITION FORMULA AND WHEN FLUSHED IT LEAKED FROM THE SITE. A CT SCAN WAS PERFORMED AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PEG TUBE WAS DISLODGED WITH THE BOLSTER IN THE SUBCUTANEOUS SOFT TISSUES AND OUTSIDE THE LUMEN OF THE STOMACH. ON (B)(6) 2021, IT WAS REPLACED WITH A NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC PEG TUBE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT WAS GIVEN IV ANTIBIOTICS FOR FIVE DAYS TO PREVENT ANY ABDOMINAL WALL INFECTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12775193 ↗
  • InjuryJul 28, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO TWO ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KITS PUSH METHOD USED IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. REFER TO MANUFACTURER REPORT# 3005099803-2021-03827 AND 3005099803-2021-03828 FOR THE OTHER ASSOCIATED DEVICE INFORMATION. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE TORE IN HALF WHEN PULLING IT THROUGH THE STOMA SITE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PART OF THE DEVICE DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WAS RETRIEVED. A SECOND PEG TUBE WAS USED AND THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12238393 ↗
  • InjuryJul 28, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO TWO ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KITS PUSH METHOD USED IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. REFER TO MANUFACTURER REPORT# 3005099803-2021-03827 AND 3005099803-2021-03828 FOR THE OTHER ASSOCIATED DEVICE INFORMATION. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE TORE IN HALF WHEN PULLING IT THROUGH THE STOMA SITE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PART OF THE DEVICE DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WAS RETRIEVED. A SECOND PEG TUBE WAS USED AND THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12238392 ↗
  • InjuryJul 15, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO TWO ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KITS PUSH METHOD USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. REFER TO MANUFACTURER REPORT# 3005099803-2021-03567 FOR THE OTHER ASSOCIATED DEVICE INFORMATION. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE WAS DETACHED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PART OF THE DEVICE WAS DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WAS RETRIEVED. A SECOND PEG TUBE WAS USED AND THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12173623 ↗
  • InjuryJul 15, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO TWO ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KITS PUSH METHOD USED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE. REFER TO MANUFACTURER REPORT# 3005099803-2021-03568 FOR THE OTHER ASSOCIATED DEVICE INFORMATION. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE WAS DETACHED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PART OF THE DEVICE WAS DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WAS RETRIEVED. A SECOND PEG TUBE WAS USED AND THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A THIRD ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12173612 ↗
  • InjuryJul 13, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE BROKE WHILE BEING PULLED THROUGH THE GASTRIC WALL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO PART OF THE DEVICE DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NON-BSC DEVICE THROUGH SURGICAL METHODS. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12158467 ↗
  • InjuryMay 24, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING AN EGD (ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY) WITH PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE WAS BROKE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PART OF THE DEVICE WAS DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WAS RETRIEVED USING A SNARE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11870846 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 13, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN PEG TUBE WAS PLACED, THE JUNCTION BETWEEN THE HARD END AND SOFTER PIECE WAS BROKEN. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO PART OF THE DEVICE DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11821046 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 7, 2021Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH METHOD WAS PLACED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PEG TUBE SPLIT INSIDE THE PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO PART OF THE DEVICE DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11629025 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 20, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) PLACEMENT PROCEDURE (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN WAS PLACING THE PEG TUBE, IT PULLED APART. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW ENDOVIVE STANDARD PEG KIT PUSH METHOD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10075322 ↗

Other TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices

All TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES) devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.