NC Quantum Apex™ H7493912415500Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTCA Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of NC Quantum Apex (48)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729783435), received between May 17, 2019 and Dec 20, 2019 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Entrapment of Device1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 20, 2019Break; Entrapment of Device; Break; Entrapment of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CATHETER ENTRAPMENT AND SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. A 15MM X 5.00MM NC QUANTUM APEX BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE. HOWEVER, UPON ENTERING A 0.14 UNKNOWN GUIDE WIRE INTO THE CATHETER, THE BALLOON SHAFT WAS STUCK ON THE WIRE IN THE GUIDE CATHETER AND AS THE PHYSICIAN WAS PUSHING THE DEVICE, THE CATHETER BROKE. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVE EVERYTHING AS HE PULLED BACK THE WIRE. A NEW WIRE AND A 20X5.00MM BALLOON WAS USED AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS FINE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TO MODERATELY CALCIFIED VESSEL OF THE LEFT LEG. THE DEVICE WAS FRACTURED MID SHAFT AND WAS REMOVED WITH THE GUIDE WIRE AND GUIDE CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9503892 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A CORONARY ARTERY. A 15 MM X 5.00 MM NC QUANTUM APEX BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SHAFT OF THE BALLOON BROKE OFF. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS FINE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8620704 ↗
Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous223 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892815200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 death203 reports
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous162 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892820200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous161 reports
- NC TREK 1012454-08Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 recalls59 reports
- TREK™ 1012272-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 deaths158 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall84 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall1 death83 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page