Skip to content

Coyote™ H74939186251010Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of Coyote (55)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729796503), received between Mar 25, 2019 and Oct 16, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Failure to Deflate1
  • Material Rupture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 16, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT POPLITEAL/TIBIAL/PERONEAL TRUNK VESSEL. A 2.5MM X 100MM X 150CM WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN A LOWER EXTREMITY PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY. THE BALLOON EXHIBITED DIFFICULTY TRACKING OVER THE WIRE BOTH DURING ADVANCEMENT AND WITHDRAWAL. THE BALLOON WAS REMOVED, AND THE WIRE WAS FLUSHED AND WIPED, HOWEVER, TRACKING DIFFICULTY PERSISTED. THE PHYSICIAN SWITCHED TO A NON-BSC WIRE, BUT SIMILAR RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING ADVANCEMENT AND REMOVAL OF THE BALLOON. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED USING NORMAL METHOD WITHOUT ISSUE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ALTERNATE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT COMPLICATION AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23312499 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 28, 2023Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE 60% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY. A 2.5MM X 100MM X 150CM COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING FIRST INFLATION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PRESSURE DROPPED BEFORE 6 ATMOSPHERES AND BLOOD CAME BACK THROUGH THE INFLATION DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A 2.5MMX150MMX150CM COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AND THE PATIENT CONDITION WAS GOOD.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16834767 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 25, 2023Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEFLATION ISSUE OCCURRED. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS OBTAINED VIA FEMORAL ARTERY. THE 100% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND MILDLY CALCIFIED ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY. A 2.5MM X 100MM X 150CM, OTW COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED AT 8 ATMOSPHERES FOR 2 MINUTES WITH A SALINE CONTRAST RATIO OF 3:1. HOWEVER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON SHOWS PERSISTENTLY INFLATED EVEN AFTER DEFLATING IT. DEFLATION ACTIVITY WAS DONE WITH HELP OF A NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC INFLATION DEVICE BY PULLING THE PLUNGER BACK RELEASE THE LOCKING LEVER. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE BALLOON WAS REMOVED THROUGH THE SHEATH CAREFULLY FOR 3 MINUTES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AND THE PATIENT STATUS WAS STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16243805 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 25, 2019Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A FROZE ON WIRE OCCURRED. THE 70% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY. A 2.5MM X 100MM X 150CM COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. HOWEVER, THE BALLOON AND A NON BSC GUIDEWIRE WAS STUCK FIRMLY INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY AND CANNOT BE WITHDRAWN. BOTH DEVICES WERE REMOVED TOGETHER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8449908 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page