Skip to content

Coyote™ H74939186301210Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of Coyote (55)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729796725), received between Nov 30, 2018 and May 26, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Failure to Deflate1
  • Material Rupture1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 26, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY. A 3.0MM X 120MM X 150CM COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. DURING INFLATION, THE BALLOON BURST BEFORE IT REACHED THE NORMAL BURST PRESSURE (NBP). THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE TARGET LESION WAS 100% STENOSED, SEVERELY TORTUOUS AND NON-CALCIFIED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22084721 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 23, 2025Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEFLATION ISSUE OCCURRED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A NON-HEALING WOUND AND UNDERWENT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAM. A 3.0MM X 120MM X 150CM, OTW COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED INTO THE PROXIMAL RIGHT ANTERIOR TIBIAL (AT) ARTERY AND WAS INFLATED TO 10 ATMOSPHERES USING A MIXTURE OF 70% SALINE AND 30% CONTRAST. HOWEVER, DURING REMOVAL, THE PROXIMAL HALF OF THE BALLOON DID NOT DEFLATE DESPITE SEVERAL ATTEMPTS. PULLED NEGATIVE ON THE BALLOON WITH AN EMPTY 10CC SYRINGE, AND ADDED MORE SALINE BUT THE BALLOON WOULD STILL NOT FULLY DEFLATE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21223778 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 23, 2019Break; Entrapment of Device; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Entrapment of Device; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON BECAME STUCK WITH THE WIRE AND THEN PEELED AWAY FROM THE WIRE. A COYOTE BALLOON WAS SELECTED FOR AN ARTERIAL PROCEDURE. WHILE LOADING BALLOON ON TO THE WIRE IT WAS STICKING, BUT THEY MANAGED TO USE IT FOR THE CASE. HOWEVER, WHEN THEY TRIED TO REMOVE IT OFF OF THE WIRE, IT WAS STUCK. IT THEN PEELED AWAY FROM THE WIRE WHILE REMOVING IT FROM INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. THIS WAS THE ONLY WAY THEY WERE ABLE TO REMOVE IT. PATIENT WAS FINE. ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT CONDITION AFTER THE PROCEDURE WAS STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8541273 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 30, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON DETACHMENT OCCURRED. A 3.0MM X 120MM X 150CM COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE; HOWEVER, WHEN THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON MATERIAL WAS BROKEN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8121293 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page