Coyote™ H74939186301210Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Coyote (55)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729796725), received between Nov 30, 2018 and May 26, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Entrapment of Device1
- Failure to Deflate1
- Material Rupture1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 26, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY. A 3.0MM X 120MM X 150CM COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. DURING INFLATION, THE BALLOON BURST BEFORE IT REACHED THE NORMAL BURST PRESSURE (NBP). THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE TARGET LESION WAS 100% STENOSED, SEVERELY TORTUOUS AND NON-CALCIFIED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22084721 ↗MalfunctionJan 23, 2025Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEFLATION ISSUE OCCURRED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A NON-HEALING WOUND AND UNDERWENT PERIPHERAL ANGIOGRAM. A 3.0MM X 120MM X 150CM, OTW COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED INTO THE PROXIMAL RIGHT ANTERIOR TIBIAL (AT) ARTERY AND WAS INFLATED TO 10 ATMOSPHERES USING A MIXTURE OF 70% SALINE AND 30% CONTRAST. HOWEVER, DURING REMOVAL, THE PROXIMAL HALF OF THE BALLOON DID NOT DEFLATE DESPITE SEVERAL ATTEMPTS. PULLED NEGATIVE ON THE BALLOON WITH AN EMPTY 10CC SYRINGE, AND ADDED MORE SALINE BUT THE BALLOON WOULD STILL NOT FULLY DEFLATE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21223778 ↗MalfunctionApr 23, 2019Break; Entrapment of Device; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Entrapment of Device; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON BECAME STUCK WITH THE WIRE AND THEN PEELED AWAY FROM THE WIRE. A COYOTE BALLOON WAS SELECTED FOR AN ARTERIAL PROCEDURE. WHILE LOADING BALLOON ON TO THE WIRE IT WAS STICKING, BUT THEY MANAGED TO USE IT FOR THE CASE. HOWEVER, WHEN THEY TRIED TO REMOVE IT OFF OF THE WIRE, IT WAS STUCK. IT THEN PEELED AWAY FROM THE WIRE WHILE REMOVING IT FROM INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. THIS WAS THE ONLY WAY THEY WERE ABLE TO REMOVE IT. PATIENT WAS FINE. ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT CONDITION AFTER THE PROCEDURE WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8541273 ↗MalfunctionNov 30, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON DETACHMENT OCCURRED. A 3.0MM X 120MM X 150CM COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE; HOWEVER, WHEN THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE STERILE PACKAGING, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON MATERIAL WAS BROKEN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8121293 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page