Coyote™ H74939186351510Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Coyote (55)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729796749), received between Dec 2, 2025 and Dec 2, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Entrapment of Device” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Entrapment of Device1
- Material Rupture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 2, 2025Entrapment of Device; Material Rupture; Entrapment of Device; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT FROZE ON WIRE AND BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE 70% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED POSTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY OF THE RIGHT LOWER LIMB. A 014 X 300 CM NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC 014 GUIDEWIRE WAS USED TO CROSS THE LESION SUCCESSFULLY. AFTER GUIDEWIRE PLACEMENT, A 3.5 MM X 150 MM X 150 CM, OTW COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS PREPARED AND ADVANCED OVER THE GUIDEWIRE WITHOUT DIFFICULTY. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED AT THE LESION WITHOUT ISSUES. HOWEVER, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING WITHDRAWAL; THE BALLOON COULD NOT RETRACT OVER THE GUIDEWIRE AND HAD TO BE REMOVED TOGETHER AS A SINGLE UNIT, RESULTING IN LOSS OF ACCESS TO THE LESION. ONCE OUTSIDE THE PATIENT, ATTEMPTS TO SEPARATE THE BALLOON FROM THE GUIDEWIRE WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. BASED ON THE ATTACHED PHOTO, THE BALLOON WAS CONFIRMED TO HAVE RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. THE PATIENTS CONDITION POST-PROCEDURE WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23698192 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page