Coyote™ H74939186201210Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Coyote (55)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729797159), received between Dec 8, 2020 and Apr 6, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Material Rupture2
- Difficult to Remove1
- Inflation Problem1
- Leak/Splash1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 6, 2026Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE 80% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED VESSEL OF BELOW THE KNEE. A 2.0MM X 120MM X 150CM COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. DURING THE SECOND INFLATION AT 4 ATMOSPHERES FOR ABOUT A MINUTE, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE BALLOON WAS REMOVED SUCCESSFULLY FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH AN ALTERNATE DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24788744 ↗MalfunctionAug 12, 2024Inflation Problem; Material Rupture; Inflation Problem; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LOCATION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATE CALCIFIED VEIN. A 2.5MM X 150MM X 150CM COYOTE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON DID NOT INFLATE AND WHEN EXPLANTED, A TEAR WAS NOTED. ANOTHER 2.0MM X 120MM X 150CM COYOTE BALLOON WAS USED AND IT BURST UPON SECOND INFLATION AT 6 ATMOSPHERES. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEM, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ALTERNATIVE METHOD. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. IT WAS FURTHER REVIEW REPORTED THE DEVICE WAS SIMPLY PULLED OUT AND THAT NO FRAGMENTS INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19960232 ↗MalfunctionMar 29, 2022Leak/Splash; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Leak/Splash; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2022. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON HAD A LEAK. A COYOTE 2.0MM X 120MM X 150CM BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE TO TREAT BRUTON'S TYROSINE KINASE. THE PHYSICIAN INSERTED THE CATHETER, AND UPON TREATMENT THERE WAS A BALLOON LEAK. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABLE TO BE COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING A NEW BALLOON WITHOUT SEQUELA. HOWEVER, DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED THE BALLOON WAS SEPARATED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13942632 ↗MalfunctionDec 8, 2020Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DIFFICULTY REMOVING A BALLOON OCCURRED. A LIMB SALVAGE CASE WAS PERFORMED ON A CALCIFIED VESSEL. A 2.00MM X 120MM X 150CM COYOTE BALLOON AND A V-14 CONTROL WIRE WERE DELIVERED THROUGH A 4FR SHEATH THROUGH THE CALCIFIED VESSEL. THE WIRE AND THE BALLOON BECAME STUCK AT THE DORSALIS PEDIS AND EXCESSIVE FORCE HAD TO BE USED TO REMOVE THE BALLOON AND THE WIRE, WHICH HAD BECOME STUCK TOGETHER. IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT, BUT THE OPERATOR HAD INTENDED TO PROGRESS TREATMENT FURTHER INTO THE PLANTAR ARCH. THE CASE WAS ABANDONED AND NO FURTHER PRODUCTS WERE USED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS RESULTED IN RELATION TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10969082 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page