Skip to content

Polaris™ Ultra M006192142050Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Ureteral Stent Set · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Polaris Ultra (40)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729798989), received between Mar 21, 2017 and Dec 24, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Calcified” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Calcified1
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 24, 2025Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Material Integrity Problem; Migration; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Material Integrity Problem; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A POLARIS ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS USED IN A PLACEMENT OF DOUBLE J CATHETER PROCEDURE. DURING INSERTION, IT WAS NOTICED THAT ONE END OF THE CATHETER WAS DAMAGED. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE STENT MIGRATED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH AN ALTERNATE DEVICE AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED STATING THAT THE TARGET ANATOMY LOCATION WAS IN THE URETER, THE STENT COULD NOT MIGRATE FROM THE URETER TO THE KIDNEY, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER POLARIS ULTRA STENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23888974 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 21, 2017Calcified; Calcified

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A POLARIS¿ ULTRA URETERAL STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE URETER ON (B)(6) 2016 AND WAS REMOVED DURING A URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINT, DURING STENT WITHDRAWAL, THE STENT WAS NOTED TO BE CALCIFIED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER POLARIS¿ ULTRA URETERAL STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6421020 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page