Epic™ Vascular H74939200106070Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Self-Expanding Stent System · Class 3
All models of Epic Vascular (50)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729805052), received between Feb 6, 2017 and Dec 16, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Entrapment of Device” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Entrapment of Device2
- Activation Failure1
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Break1
- Defective Device1
- Difficult to Advance1
- Migration1
- Premature Activation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 16, 2025Break; Entrapment of Device; Difficult to Advance; Break; Entrapment of Device; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT REMOVAL DIFFICULTY OCCURRED. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS VIA A RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY (CFA) CONTRALATERAL APPROACH. THE 95% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. A 10X60X75 EPIC SELF-EXPANDING STENT WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, ANGLE OF THE ABDOMINAL AORTIC BIFURCATION WAS STEEP, THE GUIDING SHEATH WAS ACHIEVED UP TO PRE-DILATION, THOUGH NAVIGATION WAS CHALLENGING. WHEN INTRODUCING THE DEVICE, RESISTANCE AND STIFFNESS WERE NOTED, PROMPTING CAREFUL MANIPULATION; HOWEVER, IT COULD NOT REACH THE LESION. ATTEMPTS TO RETRIEVE THE DEVICE FAILED, REQUIRING REMOVAL OF BOTH THE DEVICE AND GUIDEWIRE TOGETHER. EXAMINATION REVEALED A FRACTURED PROXIMAL SHAFT, RENDERING THE DEVICE UNUSABLE. THERE WAS NO PROCEDURAL FACTORS CONTRIBUTE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS THE RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23822331 ↗MalfunctionMar 5, 2024Premature Activation; Premature Activation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT INADVERTENT DEPLOYMENT OCCURRED. A 10X60X75 EPIC VASCULAR STENT BALLOON WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN AN ILIAC ANGIOPLASTY. THE DEVICE WAS FLUSHED AND LOADED ONTO THE WIRE; HOWEVER, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE STENT WAS EXPOSED AND PARTIALLY DEPLOYED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW 10X40 EPIC STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18840299 ↗MalfunctionAug 7, 2020Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEVICE ENTRAPMENT OCCURRED. AFTER SUCCESSFUL DEPLOYMENT OF A 10X60X75MM EPIC STENT, THE STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS STUCK WITH THE .035 NON-BSC GUIDEWIRE AND WERE REMOVED TOGETHER. A NEW WIRE WAS USED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS NOR INJURIES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10382066 ↗InjuryApr 15, 2020Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT PARTIALLY EXPANDED OCCURRED. A 10X60X75MM EPIC VASCULAR STENT WAS INSERTED AND DEPLOYED TO TREAT THE LESION. HOWEVER, DURING PROCEDURE, THE STENT DID NOT FULLY EXPAND AT DISTAL END. THE DEVICE HAS ENDED UP BEING PINCHED ON THE END EVEN AFTER IT WAS BALLOONED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9962495 ↗MalfunctionFeb 25, 2020Defective Device; Defective Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT PROFILE ISSUE OCCURRED. THE 90% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MILDLY CALCIFIED ILIAC ARTERY. A 10X60X75MM EPIC STENT WAS IMPLANTED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, DURING POST-DILATION WITH A 8X60MM STERLING BALLOON CATHETER, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT WAS 1-2CM LONGER THAN THE 60MM BALLOON. THE PHYSICIAN SUSPECTS THE STENT LENGTH ELONGATED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9752305 ↗InjuryFeb 14, 2019Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT MIGRATION OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A FISTULA. A NON-BSC BALLOON WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE ADVANCED AND WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. A 10X60X75 EPIC VASCULAR STENT WAS DEPLOYED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT MIGRATED FORWARD AND MISSED THE LESION. THE PHYSICIAN OPENED ANOTHER 9X60X75 EPIC VASCULAR STENT AND THE SAME THING HAPPENED. THE STENTS MIGRATED IN THE FISTULA AND WERE LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY AS RETRIEVING THE STENTS WOULD CAUSE MORE DAMAGE TO THE FISTULA. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SUBOPTIMAL RESULT. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8341002 ↗MalfunctionFeb 6, 2017Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEPLOYMENT ISSUE OCCURRED. DURING PREPARATION OF A 10X60X75 EPIC¿ VASCULAR STENT, UPON REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE FROM ITS CASE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT MARKER PART PROTRUDED FROM THE DISTAL TIP. THE YELLOW LOCK OF THE GRIP WAS CONNECTED AND NO DIAL OPERATION WAS PERFORMED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6304176 ↗
Other STENT, ILIAC devices
- Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control Vascular Stent System C10040MLCordis US Corp. · STENT, ILIAC1 recall3 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012534-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC51 reports
- Protégé™ GPS™ SERB65-09-60-80Ev3, Inc · STENT, ILIAC1 recall0 reports
- Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control Vascular Stent System C09060MLCordis US Corp. · STENT, ILIAC1 recall0 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012535-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC1 death41 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012631-39Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC27 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012632-29Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC25 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012536-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC21 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page