Epic™ Vascular H74939200108020Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Self-Expanding Stent System · Class 3
All models of Epic Vascular (50)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729805083), received between Dec 18, 2018 and Jun 26, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Display or Visual Feedback Problem1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Premature Activation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 26, 2025Premature Activation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Premature Activation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT PREMATURE DEPLOYMENT OCCURRED, REQUIRING INTERVENTION. THE 80% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. A 8X80X120 EPIC VASCULAR SELF-EXPANDING STENT WAS ADVANCE TO TREAT THE DISSECTION. HOWEVER, THE STENT DEPLOYED EARLY WHEN IT ARRIVED AT THE LESION SITE. THE SAFETY LOCK WAS REMOVED FROM THE HANDLE PRIOR TO POSITIONING THE DEVICE IN THE LESION. ANOTHER STENT WAS PLACED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE, AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT CONDITION FOLLOWING PROCEDURE WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22338998 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2024Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT PARTIAL DEPLOYMENT OCCURRED. DURING A PROCEDURE FOR PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC BILIARY DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY (DSA) AND SEED STENT IMPLANTATION, THIS 10X80X120 EPIC VASCULAR STENT SELF EXPANDING WAS CROSSED THE LESION SITE ALONG WITH V-18 GUIDEWIRE. DURING THE DEPLOYMENT PROCESS, THE STENT COULD NOT BE DEPLOYED IN THE SHEATH. AFTER IT WAS REMOVED, THE STENT DEPLOYED IN THE SHEATH. THE STENT AND SHEATH WERE WITHDRAWN TOGETHER FROM THE BODY AND CONFIRMED THAT THE STENT WAS PARTIALLY DEPLOYED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED, AND THE PATIENT CONDITION FOLLOWING PROCEDURE WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20231925 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2018Display or Visual Feedback Problem; Material Integrity Problem; Display or Visual Feedback Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT MARKING BAND ISSUES OCCURRED. A 10X80X120MM EPIC STENT WAS SELECTED FOR A PERCUTANEOUS STENT IMPLANTATION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PROXIMAL MARKER BAND OF THE DELIVERY SYSTEM COULD NOT BE VISUALIZED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND PATIENT STATUS WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8175899 ↗
Other STENT, ILIAC devices
- Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control Vascular Stent System C10040MLCordis US Corp. · STENT, ILIAC1 recall3 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012534-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC51 reports
- Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control Vascular Stent System C09060MLCordis US Corp. · STENT, ILIAC1 recall0 reports
- Protégé™ GPS™ SERB65-09-60-80Ev3, Inc · STENT, ILIAC1 recall0 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012535-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC1 death41 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012631-39Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC27 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012632-29Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC25 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012631-59Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC21 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page