Epic™ Vascular H74939200126020Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Self-Expanding Stent System · Class 3
All models of Epic Vascular (50)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729805182), received between Aug 15, 2019 and Nov 24, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation Failure1
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Difficult to Advance1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 24, 2025Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 28OCT2025. IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT KINKED OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE ILIAC ARTERY. A 12X60X120 EPIC STENT SELF EXPANDING WAS SELECTED FOR ANGIOPLASTY OF ILIAC ARTERY. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN FOUND THAT THE TIP OF THE DELIVERY DEVICE WAS KINKED, AND THE GUIDE WIRE COULD NOT CROSS THE DELIVERY DEVICE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. HOWEVER, DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED A PARTIALLY DEPLOYED STENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED INADVERTENTLY DURING TRANSIT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23633656 ↗InjuryAug 15, 2019Activation Failure; Activation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT FORESHORTENING OCCURRED. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS OBTAINED VIA IPSILATERAL APPROACH. THE 70% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE NON-CALCIFIED PORTAL VEIN. A 12 X 60 X 120 MM EPIC VASCULAR STENT WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, DURING STENT DEPLOYMENT, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED BUT EVENTUALLY, THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED. POST DEPLOYMENT, THE MEASUREMENT OF THE STENT WAS OBSERVED TO BE 30 MM UNDER RADIOGRAPHY WHICH COULD NOT FULLY COVER THE LESION. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PHYSICIAN IMPLANTED ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8898676 ↗
Other STENT, ILIAC devices
- Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control Vascular Stent System C10040MLCordis US Corp. · STENT, ILIAC1 recall3 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012534-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC51 reports
- Protégé™ GPS™ SERB65-09-60-80Ev3, Inc · STENT, ILIAC1 recall0 reports
- Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control Vascular Stent System C09060MLCordis US Corp. · STENT, ILIAC1 recall0 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012535-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC1 death41 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012631-39Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC27 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012632-29Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC25 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012536-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC21 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page