PROMUS Element™ Plus H7493911616350Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Everolimus-Eluting Platinum Chromium Coronary Stent System · Class 3
All models of PROMUS Element Plus (44)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729807605), received between Jan 31, 2017 and Jan 31, 2017 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Occlusion Within Device” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Occlusion Within Device1
Patient problems
- Chest Pain1
- Reocclusion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 31, 2017Occlusion Within Device; Occlusion Within Device
(B)(6) CLINICAL STUDY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT CHEST PAIN AND IN-STENT RESTENOSIS (ISR) OCCURRED. IN (B)(6) 2013, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH UNSTABLE ANGINA AND CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE DISTAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA) WITH 90% STENOSIS AND WAS 10 MM LONG WITH A REFERENCE VESSEL DIAMETER OF 3.5 MM. THE TARGET LESION WAS TREATED WITH PRE-DILATATION AND PLACEMENT OF A 3.50 X 16 MM PROMUS ELEMENT PLUS DRUG-ELUTING STENT. FOLLOWING POST-DILATATION, THE RESIDUAL STENOSIS WAS 0%. THE FOLLOWING DAY, THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON ASPIRIN AND CLOPIDOGREL. IN (B)(6) 2016, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH SUBSTERNAL CHEST PAIN RADIATING TO THE JAW AND LEFT SIDE OF THE NECK AND RIGHT ARM. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED ON THE SAME DAY. TWO DAYS LATER, CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED. THE 90% ISR IN THE MID RCA WAS TREATED WITH BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY AND PLACEMENT OF A 3.5 X 15 MM NON-BSC DRUG-ELUTING STENT WITH 0% RESIDUAL STENOSIS. THE FOLLOWING DAY, THE EVENT WAS CONSIDERED AS RESOLVED AND THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED ON ASPIRIN AND CLOPIDOGREL.
Patient problems: Chest Pain; Reocclusion
MAUDE report 6289411 ↗
Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices
- SYNERGY™ H7493926038300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent8 deaths124 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent7 deaths106 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926020300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent9 deaths90 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016250Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths82 reports
- XIENCE Sierra™ 1550350-33Abbott Vascular Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent1 recall32 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30022UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths76 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926024300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths75 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30015UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths73 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page