Direxion™ M001195340Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Torqueable Microcatheter · Class 2
All models of Direxion (14)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729839453), received between Sep 27, 2018 and Dec 16, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Defective Device1
- Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material1
- Material Deformation1
- Nonstandard Device1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 16, 2025Fracture; Nonstandard Device; Fracture; Nonstandard Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE FRACTURED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE LIVER. A DIREXION MICROCATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION (TACE). HOWEVER, DURING COIL ADVANCING, A FRACTURE OCCURRED AT THE CONNECTION POINT OF THE MICROCATHETER'S DISTAL END. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT, AND THE PATIENT WAS STABLE POST-PROCEDURE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE ROTATION AT THE END FRACTURED. NO FRACTURED DEVICE WAS INSIDE THE PATIENT BECAUSE IT WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23817174 ↗MalfunctionApr 5, 2024Defective Device; Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material; Material Deformation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Defective Device; Difficult to Open or Remove Packaging Material; Material Deformation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REPORTABLE UPON ANALYSIS COMPLETED 21MARCH2024. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS MICROCATHETER HAD KINKED. DURING IMAGING OF A RENAL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE USING A DIREXION MICROCATHETER, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE DEVICE WAS FAULTY DURING TRACKING THOUGH THE ANATOMY AND THE HUB HAD KINKED. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CARRIER TUBE WAS HYDRATED PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER; HOWEVER, THERE WAS A LITTLE RESISTANCE REMOVING THE CATHETER FROM THE CARRIER TUBE. A NEW DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE, AND NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. HOWEVER, DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED A FRACTURE AND A DEVICE SEPARATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19049957 ↗MalfunctionMay 11, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER SPLIT. A 130 DIREXION CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN A HEPATIC ARTERY CHEMOEMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE. DURING PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE MID-SECTION OF THE CATHETER RIPPED AND SPLIT WHILE DELIVERING THE CHEMO-AGENT. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DIREXION. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AND THE PATIENT WAS FINE THROUGHOUT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10042846 ↗MalfunctionSep 27, 2018Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SHAFT BROKE. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE SEVERELY TORTUOUS MESENTERICA SUPERIOR. A DIREXION MICROCATHETER WAS USED FOR AN EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE NITINOL SHAFT OF THE MICROCATHETER BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THIS DEVICE AND THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS GOOD. DEVICE EVAL BY MANUFACTURER: RETURNED PRODUCT CONSISTED OF A DIREXION MICROCATHETER. THE SHAFT WAS MICROSCOPICALLY EXAMINED. THE DEVICE SHOWED DAMAGE IN THE FORM OF A SEPARATED SHAFT IN 2 LOCATIONS. THE 1ST LOCATION WAS 43CM FROM THE HUB AND THE 2ND LOCATION WAS 44.2CM FROM THE HUB. THE SHAFT SHOWED SOME SLIGHT BENDS FROM THE TIP PROXIMALLY 12CM. INSPECTION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE DEVICE, APART FROM THE OBSERVED DAMAGE, REVEALED NO OTHER DAMAGE OR IRREGULARITIES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7914980 ↗
Other Catheter, continuous flush devices
- PROWLER SELECT 606-S255XMedos International Sàrl · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths980 reports
- PhenomTM 27 Catheter FG15150-0615-1SMicro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths139 reports
- MarathonTM 105-5056Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush124 reports
- MarksmanTM FA-55150-1030Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- Renegade™ HI-FLO™ Kit M001183020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- EkoSonic® 6779-002Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, Continuous Flush1 recall4 deaths56 reports
- Chameleon CH08-40-75USMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, continuous flush2 recalls4 reports
- RebarTM 105-5081-153Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths102 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page