Skip to content

Direxion™ HI-FLO™ Fathom™-16 System M001195750Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Pre-Loaded Torqueable Microcatheter · Class 2

All models of Direxion HI-FLO Fathom-16 System (4)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729839729), received between Mar 19, 2019 and Apr 3, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Entrapment of Device2
  • Fracture2
  • Material Deformation2
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
  • Erosion1
  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 3, 2024Entrapment of Device; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Positioning Problem; Entrapment of Device; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Positioning Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT TIP DETACHMENT, REMOVAL DIFFICULTY, AND EXTRUSION OCCURRED. A DIREXION HI-FLO FATHOM-16 SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN A UTERINE FIBROID EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE. THE TARGET LESION WAS REPORTED TO BE 20% STENOSED WITH MILD TORTUOSITY AND CALCIFICATION. WHILE ADVANCING THE SYSTEM WITHIN THE RIGHT UTERINE ARTERY, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED. IMAGING APPEARED TO SHOW THE FATHOM WIRE WAS DOUBLE BACKED UP ON ITSELF AND WRAPPED AROUND THE TIP OF MICROCATHETER. DURING WIRE REMOVAL FOR INJECTION OF EMBOLIZATION PARTICLES, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE WIRE WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE, AND EXTRA TENSION WAS APPLIED TO PULL THE WIRE FROM THE MICROCATHETER. INJECTION THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER WAS COMPLETED AND EMBOLIZATION WAS DONE. DURING MICROCATHETER REMOVAL, HIGHER THAN NORMAL RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED. WHEN THE MICROCATHETER WAS REMOVED, IT WAS NOTED THAT 3-5 CM FROM DISTAL TIP OF THE MICROCATHETER HAD DETACHED. SUBSEQUENT ANGIOGRAPHY REVEALED THAT THE MICROCATHETER TIP WAS NOT IN THE UTERINE ARTERY. NORMAL RADIAL PRESSURE WAS PERFORMED, AND THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED WITHOUT INCIDENT. HOWEVER, SEVERAL DAYS LATER, THE PATIENT CALLED AND REPORTED THAT SHE HAD PULLED OUT WHAT SHE BE

    Patient problems: Erosion

    MAUDE report 19034430 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 10, 2023Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device

    REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 18JUL2023. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER BECAME LODGED IN BOTH OF THE NON BOSTON SCIENTIFIC GUIDE CATHS USED. THE NON STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND NON-CALCIFIED VESSEL. A DIREXION HI-FLO FATHOM-16 SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT DIREXION 2.8FR CATHETER BECAME LODGED IN BOTH OF THE NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC GUIDE CATHS USED. THE AMOUNT OF SALINE FLUSHED AROUND GUIDECATHS WAS INCREASED TO ENSURE HYDROPHILIC COATING WAS ACTIVATED IN THE INNER LUMEN OF THE GUIDECATHS. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AS ONE UNIT ALONG WITH THE GUIDECATH AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. HOWEVER, DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED THAT THE SHAFT WAS FRACTURED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17502028 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 25, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT TIP DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A UTERINE FIBROID EMBOLIZATION (UFE) PROCEDURE TO TREAT POLYPS. A NGMC/FATHOM/027/BERN/1RO/155 DIREXION HI-FLO WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE TIP OF THE DIREXION HI-FLO WAS DETACHED IN THE VALVE OF THE SHEATH UPON INSERTION. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DIREXION MICROCATHETER. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16811726 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 13, 2023Break; Failure to Advance

    MID 50¿S FEMALE WITH HISTORY OF FIBROIDS AND MENORRHAGIA. PROCEDURE: IR EMBOLIZATION- BILATERAL UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION AND IMAGE GUIDED SUPERIOR HYPOGASTRIC NERVE BLOCK. DEVICE 1- WIRE WOULD NOT FEED INTO CATHER. DEVICE 2- MICROCATHETER BROKEN @ HUB. #3 OBTAINED AND USED WITHOUT ISSUES. NO KNOWN HARM TO PATIENT, MINOR DELAY IN PROCEDURE. MANUFACTURER RESPONSE FOR CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH, DIREXION¿ HI-FLO¿ (PER SITE REPORTER) WILL OBTAIN. MANUFACTURER RESPONSE FOR CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH, DIREXION¿ HI-FLO¿ FATHOM¿-16 SYSTEM (PER SITE REPORTER) WILL OBTAIN.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 16731515 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 28, 2022Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A DEVICE FRACTURE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS VESSEL IN THE UTERUS. A 155CM DIREXION HI-FLO FATHOM-16 SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE WAS MANEUVERED OVER THE FATHOM WIRE INTO THE UTERINE ARTERY, HOWEVER THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THE CATHETER WAS NOT RESPONDING TO THE TORQUE. THE DEVICE WAS THEN PULLED OUT, INTACT, BUT A FRACTURE WAS OBSERVED APPROXIMATELY AT THE MIDPOINT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15122752 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 21, 2021Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS FRACTURED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE UTERINE FIBROIDS. A 155 DIREXION HI-FLO FATHOM-16 SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE DEVICE WASN'T RESPONDING WHEN STARTED TO TORQUE THE MICROCATHETER. THE DEVICE WAS SIMPLY PULLED FROM THE DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER INTACT, HOWEVER, A FRACTURE WAS OBSERVED MIDPOINT OF THE CATHETER UPON REMOVAL. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12674671 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 4, 2020Difficult to Remove; Stretched; Material Deformation; Difficult to Remove; Stretched; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS OBTAINED VIA RADIAL APPROACH. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS OVARIAN VEIN. A 155 DIREXION HI-FLO FATHOM-16 SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, AN ANGIO DYNAMICS SOFT VU 5FR DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER WAS INSERTED INTO THE LEFT GONADAL VEIN AFTER OBTAINING RADIAL ACCESS VIA A 5FR SHEATH. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE FATHOM GUIDEWIRE WAS INSERTED THROUGH THE ANGIO DYNAMICS CATHETER DOWN INTO THE LEFT GONADAL VEIN. THE DIREXION CATHETER WAS ADVANCED OVER THE FATHOM GUIDEWIRE AND WAS ABLE TO CANNULATE THE VEIN. PUSHABLE COILS WERE DELIVERED AFTER CORRECT POSITIONING WAS CONFIRMED AND EMBOLIZATION WAS COMPLETED. HOWEVER, EXCESSIVE RESISTANCE WAS NOTED UPON PULLBACK OF THE DIREXION CATHETER. THE DIREXION AND ANGIO DYNAMICS CATHETER WERE THEN REMOVED TOGETHER AND THE TIP OF THE DIREXION WAS THEN NOTED TO BE STRETCHED AND MALFORMED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPETED WITH THIS DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10494090 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 10, 2020Break; Difficult to Remove; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Break; Difficult to Remove; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT REMOVAL DIFFICULTY OCCURRED. A DIREXION HI-FLO FATHOM-16 SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN A Y90 MAPPING PROCEDURE. A RADIAL ACCESS APPROACH WAS USED. DURING PROCEDURE, UPON ADVANCEMENT OF THE DIREXION MICROCATHETER THRU THE NON-BSC DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER, THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT RESISTANCE WAS MET WITHIN THE BASE CATHETER DUE TO THE TORTUOUS ANATOMY. THE DIREXION FRACTURED AT THE HUB AND WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. THE ENTIRE SYSTEM WAS REMOVED INTACT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10138668 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 19, 2019Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS FRACTURED. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS OBTAINED VIA RADIAL APPROACH. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN RIGHT UTERINE ARTERY. A DIREXION HI-FLO FATHOM-16 SYSTEM WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING PROCEDURE, IT WAS FOUND OUT THAT THE CATHETER WAS KINKED AND FRACTURED IN Y-ADAPTER; ONE FRACTURE RIGHT AT THE HUB AND THE OTHER ABOUT 15-20CM FROM THE HUB. CONSEQUENTLY, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO INJECT MICROSPHERES SO THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY. ANOTHER OF THE SAME CATHETER WAS USED AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. NO COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT IS STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8433662 ↗

Other Catheter, continuous flush devices

All Catheter, continuous flush devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page