REBEL™ H7493927416400Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Platinum Chromium Coronary Stent System · Class 3 · Implant
All models of REBEL (24)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729843801), received between Aug 16, 2018 and Jul 16, 2021 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P130030); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Failure to Advance1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 16, 2021Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. A 16 X 4.00 REBEL STENT WAS SELECTED FOR USE. HOWEVER, DURING UNPACKING, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SHAFT WAS BROKEN IN HALF.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12182249 ↗MalfunctionMar 28, 2019Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DAMAGE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MESENTERIC ARTERY. A 16 X 4.00 REBEL STENT WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, THE DEVICE WAS UNABLE TO CROSS THE LESION AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE PROXIMAL END OF THE STENT WAS DAMAGED. ACCORDING TO THE TECHNICIAN, THE STENT WAS NOT PREP/PULLED NEGATIVE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8459977 ↗MalfunctionAug 16, 2018Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DISLODGEMENT OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MID RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. AFTER ENGAGING THE LESION WITH A NON-BSC GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER, A 16X4.00MM REBEL STENT WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, THE DEVICE FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT CAME OFF THE BALLOON. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7791716 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P130030. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0580-2020 · Oct 24, 2019 · TerminatedRebel Monorail PtCr Coronary Stent System, REF / Catalog No. H7493927324300, Rebel MR OUS 3.0mm x 24mm. The Rebel Monorail (MR) Stent System is a balloon expandable Platinum Chro
Other STENT, CORONARY devices
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403130Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY35 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965402130Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY23 reports
- Tryton Side Branch Stent T5-2530-191-USTryton Medical, Inc. · Stent, Coronary1 death22 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403330Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY21 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403320Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY10 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403120Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY9 reports
- Tryton Side Branch Stent T5-3035-151-USTryton Medical, Inc. · Stent, Coronary2 deaths7 reports
- MULTI-LINK VISION 1007850-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, CORONARY7 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page