NC Emerge® H7493926708600Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTCA Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of NC Emerge (61)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729846345), received between Sep 30, 2022 and Jul 22, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Difficult to Remove2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Failure to Deflate1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
- Unintended Radiation Exposure1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 22, 2025Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Failure to Deflate; Difficult to Remove; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Failure to Deflate
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON DEFLATION FAILURE OCCURRED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE NON-TORTUOUS AND NON-CALCIFIED LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY. A 6.00MM X 8MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR POST-DILATION. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED AT 8 ATMOSPHERES FOR 15 SECONDS. DURING REMOVAL, THE BALLOON WAS UNABLE TO BE PULLED BACK INTO THE 7FR GUIDING CATHETER DESPITE MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO APPLY NEGATIVE PRESSURE. THE BALLOON REMAINED WEDGED AT THE CATHETER TIP, AND THE PHYSICIAN CORKED THE PARTIALLY DEFLATED BALLOON INTO THE GUIDE CATHETER. BOTH DEVICES WERE REMOVED AS ONE UNIT ALTOGETHER. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22572331 ↗InjuryMay 21, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED VIA MEDSUN # 3902560000-2025-8066 THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. DURING A CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION PROCEDURE, A 3.5 X 38MM NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC (BSC) STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOYED FROM THE LEFT MAIN (LM) TO MID LEFT CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY. THE PROXIMAL OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE WAS THE PERFORMED OF THE LM WITH A 6.00MM X 8MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER. UPON REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE, THE BALLOON SHAFT BROKE AND REMAINED IN THE LM. TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN BALLOON SAFELY, A NON-BSC WIRE WAS ADVANCED PARALLEL TO ANOTHER NON-BSC WIRE, AND A 2.5 X 15MM NON-BSC BALLOON CATHETER WAS PARTIALLY DEPLOYED WITHIN THE GUIDE TO ANCHOR THE DEFLATED 6.0MM EMERGE BALLOON FRAGMENT. THE GUIDE, WIRES AND BALLOONS WERE THEN COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE BODY UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. THE EMERGE BALLOON WAS INSPECTED AND WAS REMOVED FROM THE BODY IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22063492 ↗MalfunctionApr 2, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. A 6.00 MM X 8 MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. HOWEVER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SHAFT BROKE AT THE WIRE PORT. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED ALONG WITH THE GUIDEWIRE AND THE BALLOON. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH AN ALTERNATE DEVICE, AND NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21755152 ↗InjurySep 30, 2022Break; Difficult to Remove; Break; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DIFFICULTY REMOVAL AND SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED REQUIRING AN ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THE 90% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND MILDLY CALCIFIED LEFT MAIN (LM) ARTERY. A 6.00MM X 8MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR POST-DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING WITHDRAWAL AFTER DEFLATION, THE BALLOON WAS STUCK IN THE LM IMPLANTED STENT. WHEN PHYSICIAN APPLIED FORCE TO REMOVE THE BALLOON, THE SHAFT WAS FRACTURED AT ABOUT 15CM FROM THE DISTAL TIP. THE BALLOON AND THE REST OF THE SHAFT LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT'S CORONARY ARTERY. THE FRAGMENT WAS SNARED OUT OF THE BODY SUCCESSFULLY. THIS REQUIRED A PROLONGED PROCEDURE WITH ADDITIONAL RADIATION AND BLOOD LOSS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A 12X6 NC BALLOON CATHETER AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Unintended Radiation Exposure
MAUDE report 15510558 ↗
Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous223 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892815200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 death203 reports
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous162 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892820200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous161 reports
- NC TREK 1012454-08Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 recalls59 reports
- TREK™ 1012272-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 deaths158 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall84 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall1 death83 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page