Skip to content

NC Emerge® H7493926715220Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · PTCA Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of NC Emerge (61)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729846499), received between Sep 4, 2018 and Sep 6, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Inflation Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Arrhythmia1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Myocardial Infarction1
  • No Code Available1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Non specific EKG/ECG Changes1
  • Obstruction/Occlusion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 6, 2024Break; Difficult to Remove; Failure to Advance; Break; Difficult to Remove; Failure to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK, DIFFICULT REMOVAL AND UNRETRIEVED DEVICE FRAGMENT OCCURRED RESULTING IN PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. THE 85% OCCLUDED, STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE NON-TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED MID-CIRCUMFLEX (CX) ARTERY. A 2.25 MM X 15 MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED BUT FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION. IT WAS REPEATEDLY ATTEMPTED TO CROSS BUT FAILED AGAIN. UPON ATTEMPTED REMOVAL, THE DEVICE WAS STUCK IN THE LESION, AND THE DISTAL SHAFT WAS FRACTURED. THE FRACTURE EXTENDED APPROXIMATELY 35 CM FROM THE MID-CX THROUGH THE LEFT MAIN (LM) ARTERY AND INTO THE ASCENDING AORTA, AND WAS UNRETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ARRHYTHMIA, MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION/ISCHEMIA, ST SEGMENT ELEVATION, THROMBOSIS, AND VESSEL OCCLUSION. THE PROCEDURE WAS CANCELLED. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Arrhythmia; Foreign Body In Patient; Myocardial Infarction; Non specific EKG/ECG Changes; Obstruction/Occlusion; Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 20158831 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2024Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON CATHETER BECAME STUCK ON THE GUIDEWIRE. A 2.25MM X 15MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. HOWEVER, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON ADHERED TO THE WIRE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20006001 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 8, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED CORONARY ARTERY. A 2.25MM X 15MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. HOWEVER, UPON REMOVING THE BALLOON FROM THE GUIDE, THE MIDSHAFT OF THE BALLOON BROKE IN HALF. THE DETACHED PORTION OF THE DEVICE WAS PULLED OUT OF THE NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC GUIDE CATHETER AND BODY, AND THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED INTACT FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19269785 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 17, 2022Inflation Problem; Inflation Problem

    REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 05-APR-2022. IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON INFLATION FAILURE OCCURRED. A 2.25MM X 15MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON FAILED TO INFLATE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS STABLE. HOWEVER, RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED SHAFT BREAK.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14132244 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 18, 2021Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping; Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PACKAGING ISSUE OCCURRED. WHEN THE BOX FOR A 2.25MM X 15MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER, THE LOT NUMBER FOR THE DEVICE INSIDE THE BOX WAS DIFFERENT THAN THE LOT NUMBER ON THE BOX. THE BOX TAB WAS NOT LOOSE PRIOR TO OPENING. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11845442 ↗
  • InjuryOct 24, 2019Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE AND BALLOON DETACHMENT OCCURRED. AFTER A NON-BSC WIRE PASSED THROUGH THE LESION, A 2.25MM X 15MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING INFLATION, THE BALLOON RUPTURED AND GOT SEPARATED. THE PATIENT WAS LEFT LAB ON EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION AND WAS SENT TO CORONARY CARE UNIT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9235053 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY. A 2.25MM X 15MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. THE BALLOON WAS NOTED TO HAVE A BEND ON THE SHAFT. HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED IT WAS FINE TO USE. AS THE DEVICE WAS ADVANCED, THE BALLOON STOPPED, BUT THE SHAFT AND HUB WAS ALL THE WAY TO THE HEMOSTASIS VALVE AND WAS BROKEN IN TWO AT THE POINT OF THE TRANSITION TO THE FLEXIBLE PART OF THE SHAFT. A GUIDEZILLA II WAS ADVANCED OVER THE WIRE AND ATTEMPTED TO GRAB THE BROKEN PORTION THAT REMAINED IN THE LAD. IT THEN WENT FURTHER DOWN THE VESSEL. A SNARE WAS ATTEMPTED, BUT DID NOT WORK EITHER. A TRAPPER BALLOON WAS THEN USED TO TRAP THE BALLOON IN THE GUIDE AND EVERYTHING WAS REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7843296 ↗

Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices

All Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page