NC Emerge® H7493926715550Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTCA Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of NC Emerge (61)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729846598), received between Sep 30, 2024 and Oct 30, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Remove1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 30, 2024Break; Difficult to Remove; Break; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CATHETER REMOVAL DIFFICULTIES AND A SHAFT BREAK WERE ENCOUNTERED. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCING CARDIOVASCULAR INSTABILITY AND PERSISTENT ISCHEMIC SYMPTOMS, INCLUDING CHEST PAINS. AN ELECTROCARDIOGRAM (EKG) INDICATED A CONCERN FOR AN INFERIOR ST ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (STEMI). A 5.50MM X 15MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING INTERVENTION, THERE WAS DIFFICULTY WITHDRAWING THE BALLOON, WHICH ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN A BALLOON SHAFT FRACTURE. THE BALLOON TIP AND SHAFT REMAINED JUST PROXIMAL TO THE GUIDELINER. WHEN PULLED BACK INTO THE GUIDELINER, ABOUT 20CM OF THE BALLOON REMAINED IN THE PATIENT OUT THE GUIDE. THE BALLOON SHAFT AND TIP WERE SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVED. ALL EQUIPMENT WAS REMOVED INTACT, WITH NO APPARENT HARM TO THE PATIENT. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE TARGET LESION WAS MODERATELY TORTUOUS WITH 70% STENOSIS AND SNARING WAS PERFORMED TO COMPLETELY REMOVED THE FRACTURED DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20568310 ↗InjurySep 30, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON TIP DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE 70% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY. A 5.50 MM X 15 MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. HOWEVER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON TIP DETACHED FROM THE BALLOON SHAFT. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITH A SNARE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER 5.5 MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20334468 ↗
Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous223 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892815200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 death203 reports
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous162 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892820200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous161 reports
- NC TREK 1012454-08Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 recalls59 reports
- TREK™ 1012272-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 deaths158 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall84 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall1 death83 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page