Skip to content

NC Emerge® H7493926720370Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · PTCA Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of NC Emerge (61)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729846680), received between Sep 26, 2019 and May 9, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Entrapment of Device2
  • Material Deformation1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 9, 2025Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT MARKER MISALIGNMENT OCCURRED. THE 80% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A MILDLY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED CORONARY ARTERY. A 3.75 MM X 20 MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. DURING POST-DILATATION OF THE STENT, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON MARKERS APPEARED MISALIGNED, POSITIONED APPROXIMATELY 12 MM APART ON A 20 MM BALLOON RESULTING IN ABOUT 8 MM OF BALLOON OVERHANGING THE MARKERS. THE BALLOON WAS FULLY INFLATED DURING THE PROCEDURE, AND THE MARKERS WERE CLEARLY VISIBLE AND APPEARED CORRECTLY ALIGNED PRIOR TO DEPLOYMENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED, AND THE PATIENT REMAINED STABLE THROUGHOUT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21998599 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 3, 2023Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. THE PATIENT WAS PRESENTED WITH CARDIOVASCULAR ARTERY DISEASE AND UNDERWENT PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION. THE 90% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN MODERATE TO SEVERELY CALCIFIED AND TORTUOUS LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY (LAD) AS WELL AS RADIAL ARTERY. A 3.75MM X 12MM, 3.75MM X 20MM, 3.75MM X 12MM, AND 3.75MM X 15MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETERS WERE USED. HOWEVER, THE SHAFT OF THE FOUR CATHETERS WERE BADLY BENT AND BROKEN. THE DEVICES WERE BOTH PULLED OUT INTACT FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED DIFFERENT BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16091002 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 8, 2022Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT CATHETER ENTRAPMENT OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY. A 3.75MM X 20MM NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. AFTER BALLOON INFLATION, THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE DEVICE. HOWEVER, THE DEVICE WAS STUCK ON THE UNKNOWN GUIDEWIRE. BOTH THE BALLOON CATHETER AND THE WIRE WERE PULLED AS A UNIT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14958108 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 26, 2019Break; Entrapment of Device; Break; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT FROZE ON WIRE OCCURRED. DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING A 3.75 X 20MM NC EMERGE BALLOON, THE BALLOON FROZE ON THE WIRE INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. BOTH DEVICES WERE REMOVED TOGETHER. ONCE OUTSIDE THE BODY, THE BALLOON SHAFT FRACTURED AS THE PHYSICIAN WAS TRYING TO REMOVE IT FROM THE WIRE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9126366 ↗

Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices

All Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page