Skip to content

Wolverine Coronary Cutting Balloon H74939401103750Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Microsurgical Dilatation Device · Class 3

All models of Wolverine Coronary Cutting Balloon (22)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729888291), received between Feb 6, 2019 and Mar 26, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

6 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P950020); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Inflation Problem1
  • Material Rupture1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 26, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE CORONARY ARTERY. A 10MMX3.75MM WOLVERINE CORONARY CUTTING BALLOON WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE DEVICE ENTERED INTO THE PATIENT, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE MID SHAFT BROKE IN HALF. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY PULLED OUT FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18983880 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2020Inflation Problem; Material Rupture; Inflation Problem; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE 95% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILD TO MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED MID RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. A 10MMX3.75MM WOLVERINE CORONARY CUTTING BALLOON WAS USED POST ABLATION. DURING PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED AT 6ATM TWICE, HOWEVER IT COULD NOT INCREASE IN PRESSURE UPON THIRD INFLATION. A VISIBLE HOLE ON THE BALLOON ITSELF WAS NOTED UPON REMOVAL. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AND PATIENT WAS IN NORMAL CONDITION POST PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10683298 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 6, 2019Break; Failure to Advance; Difficult to Advance; Break; Failure to Advance; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. A PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION WAS BEING PERFORMED ON A FOCAL, CALCIFIED LESION IN THE MID RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. THE LESION WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE DILATED WITH NC TREK BALLOONS WITH NO SUCCESS. A 10MMX3.75MM WOLVERINE CORONARY CUTTING BALLOON WOULD NOT CROSS THE LESION AND THE SHAFT BROKE. A 10MMX3.50 WOLVERINE CORONARY CUTTING BALLOON WAS THEN ATTEMPTED BUT ALSO WOULD NOT CROSS AND THE SHAFT BROKE. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE WITHOUT ISSUE OR PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8310389 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P950020. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2137-2013 · Jul 31, 2013 · Terminated
    Boston Scientific, Small Peripheral Cutting BalloonTM, Sterilized using irradiation: The Peripheral Cutting Balloon Catheters are indicated for Percutaneous Transluminal Angiopla
  • Z-2138-2013 · Jul 31, 2013 · Terminated
    Boston Scientific, FlextomeTM Cutting BalloonTM, Sterilized using irradiation: 1) 4.00mm x 15mm FlextomeTM Cutting BalloonTM MonorailTM Microsurgical Dilatation Device, UPN #H74
  • Z-0621-2009 · Nov 21, 2008 · Terminated
    Flextome Cutting Balloon Device Over-the-Wire Delivery System, Coronary Atherotomy System, Over-the-Wire Delivery System, Catalog No. CB0340006, 4.00mm, Sterile. Made in Ireland:
  • Z-1512-06 · Jul 21, 2006 · Terminated
    Boston Scientific Cutting Balloon Ultra2 Monorail Device, Boston Scientific, One Boston Scientific Place, Natick, MA 01760.
  • Z-0410-06 · Dec 7, 2005 · Terminated
    The Peripheral Cutting Balloon Device small Monorail Delivery System features a balloon with 3 or 4 atherotomes (microsurgical blades) mounted longitudinally on its outer surface.
  • Z-0409-06 · Dec 7, 2005 · Terminated
    The Flextome Cutting Balloon Device consists of a balloon with 3 or 4 atherotomes (microsurgical blades) mounted longitudinally on its outer surface. When the Flextome Cutting Ball

Other Catheter, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (ptca), cutting/scoring devices

All Catheter, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (ptca), cutting/scoring devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page