Skip to content

Guidezilla™ II H7493933515080Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Guide Extension Catheter · Class 2

All models of Guidezilla II (4)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729939481), received between Sep 30, 2019 and Jan 17, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 17, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT BREAKAGE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE LEFT CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY. AN 8F GUIDEZILLA II GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, BREAKAGE WAS NOTED ON THE DEVICE WHEN USED AND PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AND PATIENT WAS STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18526219 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 30, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A DEVICE FRACTURE OCCURRED. AN 8F GUIDEZILLA II GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE INSIDE AN 8F MACH 1 GUIDE CATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS 3 HOUR CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO) PROCEDURE. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CTO ARTERY. UPON SUCCESSFUL CROSSING OF CTO AND INTERVENTION, THE GUIDEZILLA II CATHETER WAS REMOVED WITHOUT RESISTANCE. DURING WITHDRAWAL, ONLY THE HYPOTUBE WAS REMOVED. IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE GUIDEZILLA II FRACTURED AT THE NECK WITHIN THE MACH 1 GUIDE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN SECURED THE FRACTURED DISTAL END OF THE GUIDEZILLA II AND REMOVED THE MACH 1 AND GUIDEZILLA II SUCCESSFULLY TOGETHER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE ORIGINAL DEVICE USED. NO COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND PATIENT CONDITION WAS FINE. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED THE FOLLOWING DAY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9136321 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page