Ranger™ H74939419500680Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Paclitaxel-Coated PTA Balloon Catheter · Class 3
All models of Ranger (50)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729975953), received between Mar 2, 2023 and Apr 24, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture4
- Deflation Problem1
- Difficult to Advance1
- Leak/Splash1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 24, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE 99% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. A 5.0 X 60MM, 80CM RANGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. DURING FIRST INFLATION AT 6 ATMOSPHERES FOR ABOUT 10 SECONDS, THE BALLOON RUPTURED IN A PINHOLE FORM AT THE MIDDLE PART. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED USING NORMAL METHOD WITHOUT ISSUE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21903996 ↗MalfunctionJul 18, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. A 5.0 X 60MM, 80CM RANGER PACLITAXEL-COATED PTA BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON RUPTURED UPON INITIAL INFLATION. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED, AND THE PATIENT WAS IN GOOD CONDITION AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19778773 ↗MalfunctionFeb 14, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE 100% STENOSED TARGET LESION WITH STRAIGHT GEOMETRY WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MILDLY CALCIFIED SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. FOLLOWING PRE-DILATATION, A 5.0X 60MM, 80CM RANGER PACLITAXEL-COATED PTA BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED THROUGH THE SHEATH WITH A LOADING TOOL. HOWEVER, DURING THE INITIAL INFLATION, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS IN GOOD CONDITION POST-PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18703918 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2023Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance; Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON RUPTURED. A RANGER PACLITAXEL-COATED PTA BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS OBTAINED VIA AN IPSILATERAL APPROACT. THE TARGET LESION WAS 90% STENOSED WITH MODERATE CALCIFICATION AND TORTUOSITY. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED WITH A NON-BSC BALLOON. THE RANGER BALLOON WAS THEN ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION. RESISTANCE WAS NOTED DUE TO THE CALCIFICATION. DURING THE FIRST INFLATION AT 14ATM, THE BALLOON RUPTURED AFTER 30 SECONDS. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AND A NON-BSC BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17392723 ↗MalfunctionMar 2, 2023Deflation Problem; Leak/Splash; Deflation Problem; Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON WAS LEAKING CONTRAST MEDIA, AND WAS DEFLATING SLOWLY. A RANGER 5X6MM WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) TO TREAT THE PATIENT'S STENOSIS. THE TARGET LESION WAS REPORTED TO BE 90% STENOSED WITH MILD TORTUOSITY AND CALCIFICATION. THE LESION WAS PREDILATED USING A WOLVERINE 4MM. THE RANGER WAS ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION AND ATTEMPTED TO BE INFLATED AT 6 ATM, BUT THE PRESSURE DECREASED. THE BALLOON WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE DEFLATED BUT WAS DEFLATING SLOWLY. THE BALLOON WAS ABLE TO FULLY DEFLATE AND WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. WHEN INSPECTED OUTSIDE OF THE PATIENT, IT WAS REPORTED THAT CONTRAST MEDIA WAS LEAKING FROM THE BALLOON. THE RANGER WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16468895 ↗
Other Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter devices
- LUTONIX® Drug Coated Balloon LX351305150Lutonix, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter117 reports
- LUTONIX® Drug Coated Balloon LX351306150Lutonix, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter75 reports
- Ranger™ H74939419502010Boston Scientific Corporation · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter71 reports
- Ranger™ H74939419602010Boston Scientific Corporation · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter71 reports
- Lutonix® Drug Coated Balloon LX351305100Lutonix, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter66 reports
- IN.PACT™ Admiral™ ADM06004013PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter1 recall12 reports
- IN.PACT™ Admiral™ ADM06015013PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter1 recall11 reports
- IN.PACT™ Admiral™ ADM04015013PMedtronic, Inc. · Drug-Eluting Peripheral Transluminal Angioplasty Catheter1 recall8 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page