TRUSELECT™ M001394111300Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Microcatheter · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729976653), received between Dec 11, 2023 and Apr 20, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Difficult to Advance1
- Fracture1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 20, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TRUSELECT FRACTURED INTERNALLY. A TRUSELECT? WAS SELECTED FOR USE TO TREAT A BLEED IN A BRANCH OF THE INTERNAL ARTERY. THE TRUSELECT AND HOOP WERE FLUSHED PRIOR TO USE. THE PHYSICIAN PLACED A NON-BOSON SCIENTIFIC (BSC) GUIDE CATHETER, THE TRUSELECT, A TRANSEND-14 GUIDEWIRE, AND AN 010 NON-BSC GUIDEWIRE. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO ADVANCE THE WIRE AND NOTICED THE TIP OF THE GUIDE CATHETER WAS JUMPING AND TRYING TO STRAIGHTEN. THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO REMOVE THE ENTIRE MICROSYSTEM AND NOTICED THAT THE NON-BSC WIRE WAS ALL BENT UP AND THAT THE TRUSELECT HAD FRACTURED. NO PORTION OF THE DEVICE WAS LEFT WITHIN THE PATIENT, AND NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. THE TRUSELECT WAS EXCHANGED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT, AND THE PATIENT FULLY RECOVERED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24931066 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2025Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Difficult to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REPORTABLE BASED ON ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2025. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE MICROCATHETER ENTERED THE BISECTION, IT COULD NOT BE ADVANCED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A MILDLY TORTUOUS VESSEL LEADING TO RENAL HAMARTOMA. A SELECTIVE MC SINGLE BERN 130CM TRUSELECT INFUSION CATHETER WAS SELECTED TO TREAT THE RENAL HAMARTOMA. WHEN THE CATHETER ENTERED THE BISECTION, HOWEVER, THE CATHETER BECAME ASTRINGENT AND COULD NOT BE ADVANCED. AFTER WITHDRAWAL, ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT, AND THE PATIENT CONDITION FOLLOWING PROCEDURE WAS STABLE. HOWEVER, DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED SHAFT SEPARATION LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 53CM FROM THE STRAIN RELIEF.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23066195 ↗MalfunctionAug 15, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MICROCATHETER BROKE. A SELECTIVE MC SINGLE BERN 130CM TRUSELECT WAS SELECTED FOR PROSTATE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION TO TREAT BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA. DURING REMOVAL, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CATHETER BROKE. THE ORIGINAL DEVICE WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE PRIOR TO THE BREAK. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22816664 ↗MalfunctionDec 11, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE RADIOPAQUE MARKER WAS MISSING. A 130CM TRUSELECT MICROCATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN A Y90 MAPPING PROCEDURE. DURING INSERTION IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE MICROCATHETER DID NOT HAVE A RADIOPAQUE MARKER. A NEW MICROCATHETER WAS OPENED, WHICH DID HAVE THE RADIOPAQUE MARKER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18302622 ↗
Other Catheter, continuous flush devices
- PROWLER SELECT 606-S255XMedos International Sàrl · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths980 reports
- PhenomTM 27 Catheter FG15150-0615-1SMicro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths139 reports
- MarathonTM 105-5056Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush124 reports
- Renegade™ HI-FLO™ Kit M001183020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- MarksmanTM FA-55150-1030Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- EkoSonic® 6779-002Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, Continuous Flush1 recall4 deaths56 reports
- Chameleon CH08-40-75USMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, continuous flush2 recalls4 reports
- RebarTM 105-5081-153Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths102 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.