SYNERGY MEGATRON™ H7493942828350Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Everolimus-Eluting Platinum Chromium Coronary Stent System · Class 3 · Implant
All models of SYNERGY MEGATRON (28)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729985730), received between Apr 18, 2023 and Jul 11, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Device Damaged by Another Device1
- Failure to Advance1
- Fracture1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 11, 2025Fracture; Failure to Advance; Fracture; Failure to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT FRACTURE OCCURRED. THE 50-60% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED CORONARY ARTERY. A 3.50 X 28MM SYNERGY MEGATRON DRUG-ELUTING STENT WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, A STENT STRUT BROKE WHEN TRYING TO CROSS THE CALCIFIED LESION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING AN ALTERNATIVE DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22486844 ↗MalfunctionMay 9, 2024Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN CORONARY ARTERY. A 3.50 X 28MM SYNERGY MEGATRON DRUG-ELUTING STENT WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS DEFORMED. WHEN THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, THE MID SHAFT BROKE. EVERYTHING CAME OUT WITH NO ISSUES AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19279333 ↗InjuryJul 10, 2023Device Damaged by Another Device; Device Damaged by Another Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT STENT DAMAGE POST-DEPLOYMENT OCCURRED. THE 80% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED AORTO-OSTIAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). A 3.50 X 28MM SYNERGY MEGATRON DRUG-ELUTING STENT WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, AFTER INITIAL DEPLOYMENT OF THE STENT, INTERACTION WITH THE GUIDE CATHETER CAUSED AXIAL DEFORMATION OF THE STENT. AS A RESULT, SUBSEQUENT POST INFLATION BALLOONING WAS MADE DIFFICULT. A NEW WIRE WAS PLACED OUTSIDE THE FIRST ROW OF MEGATRON STENT STRUTS AND BALLOONS WERE USED IN A "CRUSH" TECHNIQUE TO CREATE AN OPENING. THEN, A NEW STENT WAS DEPLOYED AT THE OSTIUM RCA AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE PATIENT THEN UNDERWENT ANGIOGRAM OF THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE NON-TORTUOUS MID TO DISTAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. A 2.50MM X 12MM NC EMERGE WAS ADVANCED AND DEPLOYED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, DURING WITHDRAWAL, THE HYPOTUBE BROKE JUST PROXIMAL TO THE BALLOON AND REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. A NEW STENT WAS PLACED TO PIN THE BALLOON FRAGMENT ONTO ANOTHER STENT TO AVOID MIGRATION. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17290591 ↗MalfunctionApr 18, 2023Break; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Break; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. THE 90% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE SEVERELY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED CORONARY ARTERY. A 3.50 X 28MM SYNERGY MEGATRON WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, WHEN INSERTING THE MEGATRON INTO THE GUIDE, THE SHAFT SNAPPED IN HALF AT THE MIDDLE OF THE DELIVERY SYSTEM. THE PIECES WERE REMOVED WITH NO ISSUES AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16765597 ↗
Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices
- SYNERGY™ H7493926038300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent8 deaths124 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent7 deaths106 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926020300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent9 deaths90 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016250Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths82 reports
- XIENCE Sierra™ 1550350-33Abbott Vascular Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent1 recall32 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30022UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths76 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926024300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths75 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30015UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths73 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page