Skip to content

SYNERGY MEGATRON™ H7493942832500Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Everolimus-Eluting Platinum Chromium Coronary Stent System · Class 3 · Implant

All models of SYNERGY MEGATRON (28)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729985808), received between Mar 23, 2023 and Apr 12, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Difficult to Remove3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Failure to Deflate1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 12, 2024Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Integrity Problem; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT REMOVAL DIFFICULTY AND BALLOON DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE 80% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND MILDLY CALCIFIED VESSEL. A 5.00 X 32MM SYNERGY MEGATRON WAS ADVANCED FOR TREATMENT AND DEPLOYED. THE BALLOON WAS FULLY DEFLATED. HOWEVER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, EVEN THOUGH THE BALLOON WAS FULLY DEFLATED, THE PHYSICIAN HAD DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE BALLOON. WHEN THE BALLOON WAS PULLED BACK, THE BALLOON WAS PARTIALLY DETACHED FROM THE SHAFT. THE STENT BALLOON, WIRE, AND GUIDE CATHETER HAD TO BE REMOVED AS ONE UNIT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19102407 ↗
  • InjuryNov 17, 2023Break; Difficult to Remove; Break; Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT REMOVAL DIFFICULTY REMOVAL AND SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE NON-TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED PROXIMAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. A 5.00 X 32MM SYNERGY MEGATRON DRUG-ELUTING STENT (DES) WAS IMPLANTED SUCCESSFULLY. DURING THE REMOVAL OF THE DELIVERY SYSTEM, THE BALLOON BECAME STUCK. DUE TO THE CATHETER SHAFT STRETCHING FROM PULLING, THE SHAFT BROKE PROXIMAL TO THE STENT BALLOON BUT DISTAL TO THE PROXIMAL SHAFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. PART OF THE SHAFT WAS REMOVED, BUT THE BALLOON WAS STILL IN THE BODY. THE DETACHED PORTION WAS TRAPPED IN THE GUIDE WITH A TRAPPER DEVICE AND PULLED OUT AS A SINGLE SYSTEM IN A PARTIALLY INFLATED STATE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18164914 ↗
  • InjuryNov 15, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY. THE LESION WAS PREPARED USING A 1.75 MM ROTAPRO BURR FOLLOWED BY A 6.00 MM NON-COMPLIANT BALLOON. A 5.00 X 32 MM SYNERGY MEGATRON WAS DEPLOYED AND UPON REMOVAL THE SHAFT BROKE 11 CM FROM THE DISTAL TIP. THE BALLOON WITH A PORTION OF THE SHAFT WAS LEFT IN THE BODY. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE DEVICE FRAGMENT WITH A GUIDEZILLA UNSUCCESSFULLY. A SNARE WAS USED TO RETRIEVE THE REMAINING PIECE OF THE DEVICE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18145656 ↗
  • InjuryJul 10, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SHAFT BREAK OCCURRED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ANGIOGRAM OF THE TARGET LESION LOCATED IN THE NON-TORTUOUS MID TO DISTAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. A 5.00 X 32MM SYNERGY MEGATRON WAS ADVANCED AND DEPLOYED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, DURING WITHDRAWAL, THE HYPOTUBE BROKE JUST PROXIMAL TO THE BALLOON AND REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. A NEW STENT WAS PLACED TO PIN THE BALLOON FRAGMENT ONTO ANOTHER STENT TO AVOID MIGRATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE DEFLATION PERIOD BEFORE REMOVAL WAS UNDERDETERMINED BUT IT WAS FULLY DEFLATED WITH NO VISIBLE CONTRAST ON FLUORO.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 17290020 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 16, 2023Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEVICE ENTRAPMENT OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. A 5.00 X 32MM SYNERGY MEGATRON DRUG ELUTING STENT WAS ADVANCED AND IMPLANTED FOR TREATMENT. HOWEVER, THE STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS STUCK ON THE NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC (BSC) GUIDEWIRE FOLLOWING DEPLOYMENT OF STENT. THE ENTIRE SYSTEM WAS PULLED OUT TOGETHER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THIS DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16942669 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 23, 2023Difficult to Remove; Failure to Deflate; Difficult to Remove; Failure to Deflate

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DEFLATION ISSUE AND REMOVAL DIFFICULTIES WERE ENCOUNTERED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE (CAD). THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. A BOSTON SCIENTIFIC INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE WITH THE SALINE CONTRAST RATIO OF 50/50. A 5.00 X 32MM SYNERGY MEGATRON DRUG-ELUTING STENT (DES) WAS ADVANCED AND IMPLANTED. HOWEVER, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON WOULD NOT DEFLATE WELL, AND WAS DIFFICULT TO TRACK BACK THROUGH THE GUIDE. ANOTHER 5.00 X 20MM SYNERGY MEGATRON DES WAS IMPLANTED; BUT SAME ISSUE WAS ENCOUNTERED. THE FIRST BALLOON WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED AND THE SECOND BALLOON HAD TO BE REMOVED WITH THE GUIDE AND THE WIRE. THE VESSEL WAS RESELECTED AND RE-WIRED TO POST DILATE THE LESION WITH A 5.5X15 NC EMERGE BALLOON CATHETER WHICH HAD NO ISSUES IN DEFLATING. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, AND NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE PATIENT CONDITION WAS STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16600272 ↗

Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices

All Coronary drug-eluting stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page