MULTI-LINK MINI VISION 1007823-12Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Vascular Inc. · MULTI-LINK MINI VISION Coronary Stent and Stent Delivery System 2.50 mm x 12 mm / Rapid-Exchange · Class 3 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648049507), received between Apr 27, 2017 and Jan 22, 2019 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Deformation Due to Compressive Stress” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Failure to Advance1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- Angina1
- Dizziness1
- Myocardial Infarction1
- Occlusion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 22, 2019Material Separation; Failure to Advance; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Material Separation; Failure to Advance; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A HEAVILY TORTUOUS AND HEAVILY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE MID TO DISTAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY. THE TARGET LESION WAS PRE-DILATED WITH AN UNSPECIFIED DEVICE. THE 2.5X12MM MINI VISION RX BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS ADVANCED WITH ANATOMICAL RESISTANCE, AND THE BDC SHAFT KINKED AND SUBSEQUENTLY BROKE INTO TWO SEPARATE PIECES ON THE PORTION JUST INSIDE THE GUIDING CATHETER. THE ENTIRE BDC WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE PATIENT ANATOMY AS A SINGLE UNIT WITH THE GUIDING CATHETER AND GUIDE WIRE, AND IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT NO BDC DEVICE COMPONENTS REMAINED IN THE PATIENT ANATOMY. ANOTHER MINI VISION BDC WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS, AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8268787 ↗InjurySep 4, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT THAT HE HAD A MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA) ON (B)(6) 2013. FOUR VISION STENTS WERE IMPLANTED EMERGENTLY AT (B)(6) HOSPITAL, (B)(6) BY DR. (B)(6). A MINI VISION RX 2.25 X 8 MM AND A VISION RX 2.75 X 15 MM WERE IMPLANTED IN THE MID RCA, A MINI VISION RX 2.5 X 15 MM WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PROXIMAL RCA, AND A MINI VISION RX 2.5 X 12 MM WAS IMPLANTED IN THE DISTAL RCA. FOUR YEARS LATER, THE PATIENT WAS RE-ADMITTED ON (B)(6) 2017 WITH LIGHTHEADEDNESS, DIZZINESS, ANGINA AND ANOTHER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION. THE PATIENT STATED HE WAS TOLD THAT ALL FOUR OF THE PREVIOUSLY PLACED STENTS WERE 100% BLOCKED; ALTHOUGH HE WAS NOT TOLD WHETHER THIS WAS DUE TO THROMBOSIS OR RE-STENOSIS. TWO ADDITIONAL UNKNOWN STENTS WERE EMERGENTLY IMPLANTED AS TREATMENT AT FLORIDA HOSPITAL BY DR. MASSARO. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Angina; Dizziness; Myocardial Infarction; Occlusion
MAUDE report 7843593 ↗MalfunctionFeb 15, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A LESION IN AN UNSPECIFIED CORONARY ARTERY. THE 2.5 X 12 MM MINI VISION STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS) WAS INSERTED THROUGH THE COPILOT BLEEDBACK CONTROL VALVE AND ADVANCED WITHOUT RESISTANCE TO THE TARGET LESION. AT THE TARGET LESION THE STENT COULD NOT BE SEEN; THEREFORE, THE SDS WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE PATIENT ANATOMY. IT WAS THEN NOTED THAT THE STENT HAD DISLODGED AND WAS INSIDE THE COPILOT. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE NOTED DURING INSERTION WITH THE COPILOT. A NEW 2.5 X 12 MM MINI VISION WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7274579 ↗MalfunctionApr 27, 2017Detachment Of Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A MID LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY. A 2.5 X 12 MM MINI VISION STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS BEING ADVANCED OVER A BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT (BMW) GUIDE WIRE WHEN THE HYPOTUBE SEPARATED OUTSIDE THE ANATOMY. THE DEVICE WAS EASILY REMOVED FROM THE GUIDE WIRE. A NEW MINI VISION STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOYED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN PROCEDURE AND NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6528620 ↗
Other STENT, CORONARY devices
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403130Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY35 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965402130Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY23 reports
- Tryton Side Branch Stent T5-2530-191-USTryton Medical, Inc. · Stent, Coronary1 death22 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403330Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY21 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403320Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY10 reports
- WALLSTENT® Endoprosthesis H965403120Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, CORONARY9 reports
- Tryton Side Branch Stent T5-3035-151-USTryton Medical, Inc. · Stent, Coronary2 deaths7 reports
- MULTI-LINK VISION 1007850-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, CORONARY7 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page