Acculink™ 1011342-20Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Vascular Inc. · RX ACCULINK™ Carotid Stent System 10 mm x 20 mm x 132 cm Rapid-Exchange · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Acculink (13)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08717648076336), received between Dec 19, 2025 and Dec 19, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation Failure1
- Mechanical Jam1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 19, 2025Mechanical Jam; Activation Failure; Mechanical Jam; Activation Failure
FOR REPORTING PURPOSES, THE DATE OF EVENT/PROCEDURE IS ESTIMATED AS (B)(6) 2025, AS IT IS THE FIRST DATE OF THE MONTH OF THE AV ALERT DATE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT AN UNSPECIFIED LESION. PRE-DILATATION WAS PERFORMED WITH A 4.0 MM BALLOON. THE ACCULINK SELF EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM (SESS) WAS ADVANCED TO THE LESION AND DEPLOYMENT WAS ATTEMPTED. THE LEVER WAS STIFF BUT IT WAS THOUGHT THAT THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED. WHEN THE DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS REMOVED, THE STENT WAS UNABLE TO BE FOUND ON THE DELIVERY SYSTEM OR IN THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WAS CUT OPEN AND THE STENT WAS FOUND INSIDE THE SYSTEM. ANOTHER SAME SIZE ACCULINK SESS WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS. THERE WAS A SMALL DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE BUT NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23851432 ↗
Other STENT, CAROTID devices
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-0740-140-2Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls32 reports
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-NV-6-40Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls9 reports
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-NV-7-40Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls8 reports
- ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent SR-0940-CSSilk Road Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid1 recall5 deaths58 reports
- Neuroguard IEP® System NG-0640-140-2Contego Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid2 recalls7 reports
- ENROUTE Transcarotid Stent SR-1040-CSSilk Road Medical, Inc. · Stent, Carotid1 recall3 deaths56 reports
- CGuard Prime Carotid Stent System CND0840Inspire M.D Ltd · Stent, Carotid1 recall1 death41 reports
- CGuard Prime Carotid Stent System CND0940Inspire M.D Ltd · Stent, Carotid1 recall31 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page